CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsToyota LandCruiser 70 vs Audi Q5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota LandCruiser 70 vs Audi Q5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecToyotaAudi
Price (RRP)$65,690$80,900
Power151kW150kW
0-100 km/h12s8.6s
Fuel Economy10.7 L/100km5.7 L/100km
Boot Space520L
Towing3,500kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 starts from $65,690 before on-road costs, while the Audi Q5 opens at $80,900. That makes the Toyota LandCruiser 70 the more affordable entry point by $15,210.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $72,259 and $88,990 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi Q5 by roughly $7,125 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and Audi Q5 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and 85% for the Audi Q5.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Audi Q5 packs more ADAS features with 9 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Toyota LandCruiser 70.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 2 in the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and 7 in the Audi Q5. The Audi Q5 adds a 360-degree camera that the Toyota LandCruiser 70 misses.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Audi Q5 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, power tailgate, Bang & Olufsen audio and ambient lighting that the Toyota LandCruiser 70 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 uses a Diesel producing 151kW and 430Nm of torque, sent through a manual to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12 seconds.

The Audi Q5 responds with a 4-cylinder inline petrol with turbocharging and MHEV plus technology making 150kW and 340Nm, paired to a 7-speed s tronic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the clear power advantage at 151kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the Audi Q5 is 3.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,085mm wheelbase, 273mm longer than the Audi Q5 at 4,717mm (2,820mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota LandCruiser 70 generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 11.8m

Toyota LandCruiser 70 Single Cab Chassis Workmate
11.8mTighter
Best
Audi Q5 TFSI FWD SUV
11.8m
Best
Toyota LandCruiser 70
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Audi Q5
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,050/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70 and $1,625/year for the Audi Q5. That is a $1,425 annual difference in favour of the Audi Q5.

Estimated annual total: $3,050 (Toyota LandCruiser 70) vs $1,625 (Audi Q5). The Audi Q5 saves you roughly $1,425 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Audi Q5). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —5yr (Audi Q5).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Audi Q5 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Toyota LandCruiser 70 and Audi Q5 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Audi Q5 will save you roughly $1,425 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota LandCruiser 70 and Audi Q5?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 is the cheapest at $65,690 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi Q5 by $15,210.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi Q5 uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota LandCruiser 70 and Audi Q5 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Audi Q5 has the largest boot at 520L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 makes the most power at 151kW. The Audi Q5 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.6s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Cab Chassiss · All SUVs