Ford Ranger vs GWM Tank 300
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Ford Ranger starts from $37,130 before on-road costs, while the GWM Tank 300 opens at $49,990. That makes the Ford Ranger the more affordable entry point by $12,860.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,843 and $54,989 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Ford Ranger by roughly $3,705 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Ford Ranger and GWM Tank 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 84% for the Ford Ranger and 88% for the GWM Tank 300.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Tank 300 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Ford Ranger.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Ford Ranger and 6 in the GWM Tank 300.
Feature Showdown
The Ford Ranger features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the GWM Tank 300 gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GWM Tank 300 counters with panoramic roof and power tailgate that the Ford Ranger does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Ford Ranger uses a Diesel Turbo producing 125kW and 405Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The GWM Tank 300 responds with a Petrol making 167kW and 387Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.
The GWM Tank 300 has the clear power advantage at 167kW vs 125kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Tank 300 is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford Ranger measures 5,225mm long on a 3,270mm wheelbase, 510mm longer than the GWM Tank 300 at 4,715mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Ranger generally means more rear legroom.
0For towing, the Ford Ranger leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.0m to 12.9m
Based on 12.9m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Ford Ranger and $2,708/year for the GWM Tank 300. That is a $741 annual difference in favour of the Ford Ranger.
Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Ford Ranger) vs $2,708 (GWM Tank 300). The Ford Ranger saves you roughly $741 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Ranger) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 300). The GWM Tank 300 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Ranger if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the GWM Tank 300 if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The GWM Tank 300 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Ford Ranger will save you roughly $741 a year in fuel. The GWM Tank 300 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Ranger and GWM Tank 300?
The Ford Ranger is the cheapest at $37,130 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Tank 300 by $12,860.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Ford Ranger uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Ford Ranger and GWM Tank 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The GWM Tank 300 has the largest boot at 550L.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Ranger has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Tank 300 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The GWM Tank 300 makes the most power at 167kW. The GWM Tank 300 is quickest to 100km/h in 9.5s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
