Volvo XC60 vs Mazda CX-70
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Volvo XC60 starts from $74,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-70 opens at $76,720. That makes the Volvo XC60 the more affordable entry point by $1,730.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $82,489 and $84,392 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Volvo XC60 and Mazda CX-70 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-70 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Volvo XC60.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Volvo XC60 and 7 in the Mazda CX-70.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Volvo XC60 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio that you will not find on the Mazda CX-70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Volvo XC60 uses a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5 producing 183kW and 350Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.
The Mazda CX-70 responds with a Petrol making 254kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.
The Mazda CX-70 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 183kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Volvo XC60 measures 4,688mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 432mm shorter than the Mazda CX-70 at 5,120mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-70 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 505L in the Volvo XC60 and 598L in the Mazda CX-70, giving the Mazda CX-70 a 93L advantage.
For towing, the Mazda CX-70 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 2,400kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m to 12.1m
Based on 12.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,166/year for the Volvo XC60 and $2,309/year for the Mazda CX-70. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Volvo XC60.
Estimated annual total: $2,166 (Volvo XC60) vs $2,309 (Mazda CX-70). The Volvo XC60 saves you roughly $143 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC60) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-70). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Volvo XC60 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-70 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-70 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Volvo XC60 will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-70 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Volvo XC60 and Mazda CX-70?
The Volvo XC60 is the cheapest at $74,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-70 by $1,730.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Volvo XC60 uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Volvo XC60 and Mazda CX-70 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-70 has the largest boot at 598L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-70 makes the most power at 254kW.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
