CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAbarth 695 vs Toyota GR86
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Abarth 695 vs Toyota GR86

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAbarthToyota
Price (RRP)$48,369$43,240
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power132kW174kW
0-100 km/h6.7s6.3s
Fuel Economy6 L/100km9.4 L/100km
Boot Space185L226L
Warranty3yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Abarth 695 & Toyota GR86

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Abarth 695 starts from $48,369 before on-road costs, while the Toyota GR86 opens at $43,240. That makes the Toyota GR86 the more affordable entry point by $5,129.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $53,206 and $47,564 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Abarth 695 by roughly $4,845 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Abarth 695 features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota GR86 gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Abarth 695 gets fabric upholstery while the Toyota GR86 offers cloth. Climate control is 1-zone in the Abarth 695 and 2-zone in the Toyota GR86.

Drivetrain

The Abarth 695 uses a Turbo T-Jet producing 132kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.

The Toyota GR86 responds with a Petrol making 174kW and 250Nm, paired to a manual driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.3 seconds.

The Toyota GR86 has the clear power advantage at 174kW vs 132kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota GR86 is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Abarth 695 measures 3,657mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 608mm shorter than the Toyota GR86 at 4,265mm (2,575mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota GR86 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 695 and 226L in the Toyota GR86, giving the Toyota GR86 a 41L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 10.6m

TightestAbarth 695 CompetizioneTightest turn at 9.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3mTighter
Best
Toyota GR86 GT Manual
10.6m
Worst
Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota GR86 GT Manual
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestAbarth 695Tightest turn at 9.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Abarth 695Tightest9.3 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Toyota GR8610.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Abarth 695 and $2,679/year for the Toyota GR86. That is a $969 annual difference in favour of the Abarth 695.

Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Abarth 695) vs $2,679 (Toyota GR86). The Abarth 695 saves you roughly $969 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 695) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota GR86). The Toyota GR86 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Abarth 695 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota GR86 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota GR86 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Abarth 695 will save you roughly $969 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota GR86 has a clear edge. The Toyota GR86 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Abarth 695 and Toyota GR86?

The Toyota GR86 is the cheapest at $43,240 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Abarth 695 by $5,129.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Abarth 695 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Abarth 695 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota GR86 has the largest boot at 226L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Toyota GR86 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota GR86 makes the most power at 174kW. The Toyota GR86 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.3s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars