Abarth 695 vs MG 7
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Abarth 695 & MG 7
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Abarth 695 starts from $48,369 before on-road costs, while the MG 7 opens at $44,990. That makes the MG 7 the more affordable entry point by $3,379.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $53,206 and $49,489 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Abarth 695 by roughly $2,850 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Abarth 695 and MG 7 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MG 7 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 2 in the Abarth 695.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Abarth 695 and 7 in the MG 7. The MG 7 adds a 360-degree camera that the Abarth 695 misses.
Feature Showdown
The Abarth 695 features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the MG 7 gets a 12.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Abarth 695 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the MG 7. The MG 7 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate, Bose audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Abarth 695 gets fabric upholstery while the MG 7 offers leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Abarth 695 and 2-zone in the MG 7.
Drivetrain
The Abarth 695 uses a Turbo T-Jet producing 132kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.
The MG 7 responds with a 2.0L Turbo Petrol making 170kW and 380Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels.
The MG 7 has the clear power advantage at 170kW vs 132kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Abarth 695 measures 3,657mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 1227mm shorter than the MG 7 at 4,884mm (2,778mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG 7 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 695 and 375L in the MG 7, giving the MG 7 a 190L advantage. The MG 7 seats 5 vs 4.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.3m diameter
Excellent
Based on 9.3m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator — U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Excellent
Clears the U-turn in one swing
Needs about 8.2 m of road; you have 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m — clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m — 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.6 m wide — fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m — swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m — no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Abarth 695 and $2,280/year for the MG 7. That is a $570 annual difference in favour of the Abarth 695.
Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Abarth 695) vs $2,280 (MG 7). The Abarth 695 saves you roughly $570 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 695) vs 10 years / 250,000km (MG 7). The MG 7 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Abarth 695 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the MG 7 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The MG 7 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Abarth 695 will save you roughly $570 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG 7 has a clear edge. The MG 7 adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Abarth 695 and MG 7?
The MG 7 is the cheapest at $44,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Abarth 695 by $3,379.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Abarth 695 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Abarth 695 and MG 7 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The MG 7 has the largest boot at 375L.
Which has the best warranty?
The MG 7 has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The MG 7 makes the most power at 170kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
