CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAlfa Romeo Stelvio vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Alfa Romeo Stelvio vs Ford Mustang Mach-E

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAlfa RomeoFord
Price (RRP)$85,990$80,490
Fuel typePetrolElectric
Range (WLTP)540km
Battery91 kWh
Power206kW212kW
0-100 km/h5.7s7s
Max DC Charge150kW
10-80% Charge Time28 min
Fuel Economy7 L/100km
Boot Space525L402L
Towing1,814kg
Warranty5yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Alfa Romeo Stelvio & Ford Mustang Mach-E

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio starts from $85,990 before on-road costs, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E opens at $80,490. That makes the Ford Mustang Mach-E the more affordable entry point by $5,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $94,589 and $88,539 respectively.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Alfa Romeo Stelvio, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

88kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 24m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 150kW · 0–80%

35 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 150kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio features a 8.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E gets a 15.5-inch display and 10.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio stands out with Apple CarPlay, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The Ford Mustang Mach-E counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and Bang & Olufsen audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Alfa Romeo Stelvio gets leather upholstery while the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio uses a Petrol producing 206kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.7 seconds.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E responds with a Electric Motor making 212kW and 525Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7 seconds.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the clear power advantage at 212kW vs 206kW. In the real-world sprint, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio measures 4,686mm long on a 2,818mm wheelbase, 27mm shorter than the Ford Mustang Mach-E at 4,713mm (2,984mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Mustang Mach-E generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 525L in the Alfa Romeo Stelvio and 402L in the Ford Mustang Mach-E, giving the Alfa Romeo Stelvio a 123L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m diameter

Average

Alfa Romeo Stelvio Veloce
11.8m
Alfa Romeo Stelvio Veloce
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator — U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Alfa Romeo Stelvio Turning circle · Ø 11.8 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.5 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m — 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m — 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide — fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m — careful, tight swing

Narrow laneway

3.5 m — no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 150,000km (Alfa Romeo Stelvio) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Mustang Mach-E). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Alfa Romeo Stelvio if: You need more boot space, or prefer Alfa Romeo's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Mustang Mach-E if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Alfa Romeo Stelvio and Ford Mustang Mach-E trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Alfa Romeo Stelvio and Ford Mustang Mach-E?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the cheapest at $80,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Alfa Romeo Stelvio by $5,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio uses the least fuel at 7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Ford Mustang Mach-E all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio has the largest boot at 525L.

Which can tow the most?

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,814kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E makes the most power at 212kW. The Alfa Romeo Stelvio is quickest to 100km/h in 5.7s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best electric SUVs