CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAudi e-tron GT vs BMW M8
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi e-tron GT vs BMW M8

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAudiBMW
Price (RRP)$209,900$377,000
Fuel typeElectricPetrol
Range (WLTP)559km
Battery105 kWh
Power500kW460kW
0-100 km/h3.4s3.2s
Max DC Charge320kW
10-80% Charge Time18 min
Fuel Economy10.7 L/100km
Boot Space405L440L
Towing1,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Audi e-tron GT & BMW M8

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Audi e-tron GT starts from $209,900 before on-road costs, while the BMW M8 opens at $377,000. That makes the Audi e-tron GT the more affordable entry point by $167,100.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $230,890 and $414,700 respectively.

The Audi e-tron GT qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The BMW M8, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

97kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 33m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 320kW · 0–80%

18 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (22kW AC, 320kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Audi e-tron GT features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the BMW M8 gets a 10.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi e-tron GT stands out with Bang & Olufsen audio that you will not find on the BMW M8. The BMW M8 counters with wireless charging, panoramic roof and Bowers & Wilkins audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Audi e-tron GT gets leather upholstery while the BMW M8 offers merino leather.

Drivetrain

The Audi e-tron GT uses a Electric producing 500kW and 717Nm of torque, sent through a single speed to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.4 seconds.

The BMW M8 responds with a Petrol making 460kW and 750Nm, paired to a auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 3.2 seconds.

The Audi e-tron GT has the clear power advantage at 500kW vs 460kW. In the real-world sprint, the BMW M8 is 0.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Audi e-tron GT measures 4,989mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 109mm shorter than the BMW M8 at 5,098mm (3,027mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW M8 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 405L in the Audi e-tron GT and 440L in the BMW M8, giving the BMW M8 a 35L advantage. The Audi e-tron GT seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.6m

BMW M8 Competition Gran Coupe
11.4mTighter
Best
Audi e-tron GT S e-tron GT
11.6m
Worst
Audi e-tron GT S e-tron GT
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
BMW M8 Competition Gran Coupe
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Audi e-tron GT) vs 5 years / 999,999km (BMW M8). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi e-tron GT if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BMW M8 if: You need more boot space, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Audi e-tron GT takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the BMW M8 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi e-tron GT and BMW M8?

The Audi e-tron GT is the cheapest at $209,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BMW M8 by $167,100.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW M8 uses the least fuel at 10.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Audi e-tron GT and BMW M8 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The BMW M8 has the largest boot at 440L.

Which can tow the most?

The Audi e-tron GT has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Audi e-tron GT makes the most power at 500kW. The BMW M8 is quickest to 100km/h in 3.2s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans