CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAudi RS3 vs Kia Stinger
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi RS3 vs Kia Stinger

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Kia Stinger: we're still completing price, kerb weight and 0-100km/h.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecAudiKia
Price (RRP)$101,515TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power294kW182kW
0-100 km/h3.8s
Fuel Economy8.2 L/100km8.8 L/100km
Boot Space321L406L
Towing1,900kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Audi RS3 & Kia Stinger

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Audi RS3 features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Kia Stinger gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi RS3 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, Sonos 3D Premium audio and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Kia Stinger. The Kia Stinger counters with Apple CarPlay and ventilated seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Audi RS3 gets nappa leather upholstery while the Kia Stinger offers sports leather appointed (black or red).

Drivetrain

The Audi RS3 uses a 5-cylinder petrol with direct fuel injection, turbocharging producing 294kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed s tronic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.8 seconds.

The Kia Stinger responds with a 2.0L Turbo Petrol (T-GDI, D-CVVT, 16 valve) making 182kW and 353Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic driving the rear wheels.

The Audi RS3 has the clear power advantage at 294kW vs 182kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Audi RS3 measures 4,548mm long on a 2,630mm wheelbase, 282mm shorter than the Kia Stinger at 4,830mm (2,905mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia Stinger generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 321L in the Audi RS3 and 406L in the Kia Stinger, giving the Kia Stinger a 85L advantage.

For towing, the Audi RS3 leads with a 1,900kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 11.2m

TightestAudi RS3 SedanTightest turn at 11.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Audi RS3 Sedan
11.1mTighter
Best
Kia Stinger GT-Line
11.2m
Worst
Audi RS3 Sedan
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Kia Stinger GT-Line
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestAudi RS3Tightest turn at 11.1m, needs the least road to swing around
Audi RS3Tightest11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Kia Stinger11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,337/year for the Audi RS3 and $2,508/year for the Kia Stinger. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Audi RS3.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Audi RS3) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Stinger). The Kia Stinger has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi RS3 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Kia Stinger if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Audi RS3 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Audi RS3 will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia Stinger has a clear edge. The Kia Stinger adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi RS3 and Kia Stinger?

The Audi RS3 is the cheapest at $101,515 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi RS3 uses the least fuel at 8.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Kia Stinger holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Audi RS3, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia Stinger has the largest boot at 406L.

Which can tow the most?

The Audi RS3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,900kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia Stinger has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Audi RS3 makes the most power at 294kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · All Liftbacks · Best family cars