CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW X2 vs Mazda CX-90
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW X2 vs Mazda CX-90

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBMWMazda
Price (RRP)$75,900$74,385
Power150kW254kW
0-100 km/h6.8s7.8s
Fuel Economy7.5 L/100km8.2 L/100km
Boot Space410L257L
Towing1,500kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The BMW X2 starts from $75,900 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-90 opens at $74,385. That makes the Mazda CX-90 the more affordable entry point by $1,515.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $83,490 and $81,824 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the BMW X2 and Mazda CX-90 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 90% for the BMW X2 and 91% for the Mazda CX-90.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the BMW X2 and 6 in the Mazda CX-90.

Feature Showdown

The BMW X2 features a 10.7-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-90 gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BMW X2 stands out with Harman Kardon audio that you will not find on the Mazda CX-90. The Mazda CX-90 counters with wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The BMW X2 uses a Petrol producing 150kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.8 seconds.

The Mazda CX-90 responds with a Petrol making 254kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.

The Mazda CX-90 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the BMW X2 is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW X2 measures 4,554mm long on a 2,692mm wheelbase, 546mm shorter than the Mazda CX-90 at 5,100mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-90 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 410L in the BMW X2 and 257L in the Mazda CX-90, giving the BMW X2 a 153L advantage. The Mazda CX-90 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mazda CX-90 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.3m to 12.0m

BMW X2 xDrive20i M Sport
11.3mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-90 G50e Touring
12.0m
Worst
BMW X2
11.3m · Average

Based on 11.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-90
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,138/year for the BMW X2 and $2,337/year for the Mazda CX-90. That is a $199 annual difference in favour of the BMW X2.

Estimated annual total: $2,138 (BMW X2) vs $2,337 (Mazda CX-90). The BMW X2 saves you roughly $199 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW X2) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-90). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW X2 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-90 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The BMW X2 and Mazda CX-90 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The BMW X2 will save you roughly $199 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BMW X2 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs