CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 4 vs Suzuki Vitara
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 4 vs Suzuki Vitara

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCherySuzuki
Price (RRP)$23,990$38,490
Power108kW95kW
0-100 km/h10.5s10.2s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km5.8 L/100km
Boot Space358L375L
Towing1,500kg1,200kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 starts from $23,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Vitara opens at $38,490. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 the more affordable entry point by $14,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $26,389 and $42,339 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Vitara by roughly $2,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Chery Tiggo 4 and Suzuki Vitara hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 4 and 77% for the Suzuki Vitara.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Suzuki Vitara packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Chery Tiggo 4.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 and 6 in the Suzuki Vitara.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Suzuki Vitara gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 4 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Suzuki Vitara. The Suzuki Vitara counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 4 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Suzuki Vitara responds with a Petrol making 95kW and 220Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 4 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 95kW. In the real-world sprint, the Suzuki Vitara is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 4 measures 4,307mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 132mm longer than the Suzuki Vitara at 4,175mm (2,500mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 4 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 and 375L in the Suzuki Vitara, giving the Suzuki Vitara a 17L advantage.

For towing, the Chery Tiggo 4 leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.2m to 10.6m

Suzuki Vitara GLX Turbo
10.2mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 4 Urban
10.6m
Worst
Chery Tiggo 4
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Vitara
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 and $1,653/year for the Suzuki Vitara. That is a $456 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Vitara.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Chery Tiggo 4) vs $1,653 (Suzuki Vitara). The Suzuki Vitara saves you roughly $456 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Vitara). The Chery Tiggo 4 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Vitara if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 4 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki Vitara will save you roughly $456 a year in fuel. The Chery Tiggo 4 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 and Suzuki Vitara?

The Chery Tiggo 4 is the cheapest at $23,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Vitara by $14,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Vitara uses the least fuel at 5.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 4 and Suzuki Vitara all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Suzuki Vitara has the largest boot at 375L.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Tiggo 4 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Tiggo 4 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 4 makes the most power at 108kW. The Suzuki Vitara is quickest to 100km/h in 10.2s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs