CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs GWM Haval H6GT
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs GWM Haval H6GT

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryGWM
Price (RRP)$38,990$44,990
Power180kW179kW
0-100 km/h8.5s8.5s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot Space550L471L
Towing2,000kg2,000kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max starts from $38,990 before on-road costs, while the GWM Haval H6GT opens at $44,990. That makes the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max the more affordable entry point by $6,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $42,889 and $49,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GWM Haval H6GT by roughly $3,135 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and GWM Haval H6GT hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 90% for the GWM Haval H6GT.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Haval H6GT packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 10 in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 6 in the GWM Haval H6GT. The GWM Haval H6GT adds a 360-degree camera that the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max misses.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the GWM Haval H6GT gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max stands out with Sony audio that you will not find on the GWM Haval H6GT. The GWM Haval H6GT counters with head-up display and heated front seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max uses a Petrol producing 180kW and 375Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The GWM Haval H6GT responds with a Petrol making 179kW and 380Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 179kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max measures 4,720mm long on a 2,710mm wheelbase, 7mm shorter than the GWM Haval H6GT at 4,727mm (2,738mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval H6GT generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 550L in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 471L in the GWM Haval H6GT, giving the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max a 79L advantage. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the GWM Haval H6GT leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 12.0m

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max Urban FWD
11.8mTighter
Best
GWM Haval H6GT Ultra
12.0m
Worst
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Haval H6GT
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and $1,682/year for the GWM Haval H6GT. That is a $627 annual difference in favour of the GWM Haval H6GT.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs $1,682 (GWM Haval H6GT). The GWM Haval H6GT saves you roughly $627 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H6GT). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Haval H6GT if: You want lower running costs, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The GWM Haval H6GT will save you roughly $627 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and GWM Haval H6GT?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is the cheapest at $38,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Haval H6GT by $6,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Haval H6GT uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and GWM Haval H6GT all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the largest boot at 550L.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max makes the most power at 180kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs