CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsCitroen C3 vs Hyundai i30 Sedan
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Citroen C3 vs Hyundai i30 Sedan

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCitroenHyundai
Price (RRP)$32,267$29,250
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power81kW110kW
0-100 km/h10.9s
Fuel Economy5.2 L/100km6.1 L/100km
Boot Space300L474L
Towing450kg1,100kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data3 Stars

Track the Citroen C3 & Hyundai i30 Sedan

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Citroen C3 starts from $32,267 before on-road costs, while the Hyundai i30 Sedan opens at $29,250. That makes the Hyundai i30 Sedan the more affordable entry point by $3,017.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $35,494 and $32,175 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Citroen C3 by roughly $1,285 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Citroen C3 gets cloth upholstery while the Hyundai i30 Sedan offers leather.

Drivetrain

The Citroen C3 uses a Petrol producing 81kW and 205Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The Hyundai i30 Sedan responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 180Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels.

The Hyundai i30 Sedan has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 81kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Citroen C3 measures 3,996mm long on a 2,539mm wheelbase, 714mm shorter than the Hyundai i30 Sedan at 4,710mm (2,720mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai i30 Sedan generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 300L in the Citroen C3 and 474L in the Hyundai i30 Sedan, giving the Hyundai i30 Sedan a 174L advantage.

For towing, the Hyundai i30 Sedan leads with a 1,100kg braked capacity vs 450kg. That 650kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m diameter

Good

Hyundai i30 Sedan Active
10.8m
Hyundai i30 Sedan Active
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator — U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
Hyundai i30 Sedan Turning circle · Ø 10.8 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m — clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m — 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide — fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m — swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m — no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,482/year for the Citroen C3 and $1,739/year for the Hyundai i30 Sedan. That is a $257 annual difference in favour of the Citroen C3.

Estimated annual total: $1,482 (Citroen C3) vs $1,739 (Hyundai i30 Sedan). The Citroen C3 saves you roughly $257 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Citroen C3) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai i30 Sedan). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Citroen C3 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Citroen's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Hyundai i30 Sedan if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Hyundai i30 Sedan takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Citroen C3 will save you roughly $257 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Hyundai i30 Sedan has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Citroen C3 and Hyundai i30 Sedan?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan is the cheapest at $29,250 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Citroen C3 by $3,017.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Citroen C3 uses the least fuel at 5.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Hyundai i30 Sedan all hold a 3-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan has the largest boot at 474L.

Which can tow the most?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,100kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan makes the most power at 110kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars