CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsCUPRA Tavascan vs Mazda CX-90
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

CUPRA Tavascan vs Mazda CX-90

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCUPRAMazda
Price (RRP)$66,490$66,100
Fuel typeElectricPetrol
Range (WLTP)531km
Battery77 kWh
Power210kW254kW
0-100 km/h6.8s6.9s
Max DC Charge135kW
10-80% Charge Time26 min
Fuel Economy8.2 L/100km
Boot Space540L257L
Towing1,000kg2,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety4 StarsNo data

Track the CUPRA Tavascan & Mazda CX-90

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The CUPRA Tavascan starts from $66,490 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-90 opens at $66,100. That makes the Mazda CX-90 the more affordable entry point by $390.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $73,139 and $72,710 respectively.

The CUPRA Tavascan qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda CX-90, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

77kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 14m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 135kW · 0–80%

34 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 135kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The CUPRA Tavascan features a 15-inch touchscreen paired with a 5.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-90 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The CUPRA Tavascan stands out with heated front seats and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mazda CX-90. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the CUPRA Tavascan gets cloth upholstery while the Mazda CX-90 offers leather.

Drivetrain

The CUPRA Tavascan uses a Electric Motor producing 210kW and 545Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.8 seconds.

The Mazda CX-90 responds with a Petrol making 254kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-90 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 210kW. In the real-world sprint, the CUPRA Tavascan is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The CUPRA Tavascan measures 4,644mm long on a 2,766mm wheelbase, 476mm shorter than the Mazda CX-90 at 5,120mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-90 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 540L in the CUPRA Tavascan and 257L in the Mazda CX-90, giving the CUPRA Tavascan a 283L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1550L vs 2025L. The Mazda CX-90 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mazda CX-90 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.2m to 10.8m

TightestCUPRA Tavascan EnduranceTightest turn at 10.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
CUPRA Tavascan Endurance
10.2mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-90 G50e Touring
10.8m
Worst
CUPRA Tavascan Endurance
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-90 G50e Touring
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestCUPRA TavascanTightest turn at 10.2m, needs the least road to swing around
CUPRA TavascanTightest10.2 m
Good△ 3-point
Mazda CX-9010.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (CUPRA Tavascan) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-90). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the CUPRA Tavascan if: You need more boot space, or prefer CUPRA's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-90 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The CUPRA Tavascan and Mazda CX-90 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the CUPRA Tavascan has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, CUPRA Tavascan and Mazda CX-90?

The Mazda CX-90 is the cheapest at $66,100 before on-road costs. That undercuts the CUPRA Tavascan by $390.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-90 uses the least fuel at 8.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — CUPRA Tavascan all hold a 4-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The CUPRA Tavascan has the largest boot at 540L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-90 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-90 makes the most power at 254kW. The CUPRA Tavascan is quickest to 100km/h in 6.8s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs · Best hybrid cars