Ford Everest vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Ford Everest
From $59,490
SUV
Diesel
Diesel Bi-Turbo
154kW
7.2 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
259L
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Price TBC
SUV
Diesel
3.0 i6 Diesel Mild Hybrid
183kW
7.4 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
835L
Track the Ford Everest & Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Ford Everest features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets a 13.1-inch display and 13.7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport counters with heated front seats, power tailgate, Meridian audio and ambient lighting that the Ford Everest does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Ford Everest gets cloth upholstery while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Ford Everest and 3-zone in the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Drivetrain
The Ford Everest uses a Diesel Bi-Turbo producing 154kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.1 seconds.
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport responds with a 3.0 i6 Diesel Mild Hybrid making 183kW and 600Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.7 seconds.
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport has the clear power advantage at 183kW vs 154kW. In the real-world sprint, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford Everest measures 4,978mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 32mm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport at 4,946mm (2,997mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Range Rover Sport generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 259L in the Ford Everest and 835L in the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, giving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport a 576L advantage.
For towing, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m to 11.8m
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,052/year for the Ford Everest and $2,109/year for the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Ford Everest.
Estimated annual total: $2,052 (Ford Everest) vs $2,109 (Land Rover Range Rover Sport). The Ford Everest saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Sport). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Everest if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Sport if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Ford Everest will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Everest and Land Rover Range Rover Sport?
The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $59,490 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Ford Everest uses the least fuel at 7.2L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport has the largest boot at 835L.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport makes the most power at 183kW. The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is quickest to 100km/h in 7.7s.
Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet
Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
