Ford F-150 vs Audi RS3
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Ford F-150
From $106,950
Pick-up
Petrol V6 Twin-Turbo (EcoBoost)
298kW
13.4 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
—
Audi RS3
From $101,515
Sedan
5-cylinder petrol with direct fuel injection, turbocharging
294kW
8.2 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
321L
Price Breakdown
The Ford F-150 starts from $106,950 before on-road costs, while the Audi RS3 opens at $101,515. That makes the Audi RS3 the more affordable entry point by $5,435.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $117,645 and $111,667 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi RS3 by roughly $7,410 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Ford F-150 features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 12-inch digital dash, while the Audi RS3 gets a 10.1-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Ford F-150 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Audi RS3. The Audi RS3 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, heated front seats, Sonos 3D Premium audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Ford F-150 gets cloth upholstery while the Audi RS3 offers nappa leather.
Drivetrain
The Ford F-150 uses a Petrol V6 Twin-Turbo (EcoBoost) producing 298kW and 678Nm of torque, sent through a 10-speed automatic to a 4x4 layout.
The Audi RS3 responds with a 5-cylinder petrol with direct fuel injection, turbocharging making 294kW and 500Nm, paired to a 7-speed s tronic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 3.8 seconds.
The Ford F-150 has the clear power advantage at 298kW vs 294kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford F-150 measures 5,908mm long on a 3,697mm wheelbase, 1360mm longer than the Audi RS3 at 4,548mm (2,630mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford F-150 generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Ford F-150 leads with a 4,500kg braked capacity vs 1,900kg. That 2,600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.1m diameter
Average
Based on 11.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,819/year for the Ford F-150 and $2,337/year for the Audi RS3. That is a $1,482 annual difference in favour of the Audi RS3.
Estimated annual total: $3,819 (Ford F-150) vs $2,337 (Audi RS3). The Audi RS3 saves you roughly $1,482 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years (Ford F-150) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Audi RS3). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford F-150 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Audi RS3 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Ford F-150 and Audi RS3 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Audi RS3 will save you roughly $1,482 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford F-150 and Audi RS3?
The Audi RS3 is the cheapest at $101,515 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford F-150 by $5,435.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Audi RS3 uses the least fuel at 8.2L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Audi RS3 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford F-150 has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford F-150 makes the most power at 298kW.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
