CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Mustang Mach-E vs Land Rover Defender 110
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Land Rover Defender 110

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordLand Rover
Price (RRP)$86,990$100,900
Range (WLTP)540km
Battery91 kWh
Power198kW183kW
0-100 km/h7s8.3s
Max DC Charge150kW
10-80% Charge Time28 min
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km
Boot Space402L972L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Ford Mustang Mach-E starts from $86,990 before on-road costs, while the Land Rover Defender 110 opens at $100,900. That makes the Ford Mustang Mach-E the more affordable entry point by $13,910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $95,689 and $110,990 respectively.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Land Rover Defender 110, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Land Rover Defender 110 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 85% for the Land Rover Defender 110.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Land Rover Defender 110 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Ford Mustang Mach-E.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. The Ford Mustang Mach-E adds a 360-degree camera that the Land Rover Defender 110 misses.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Mustang Mach-E features a 15.5-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.2-inch digital dash, while the Land Rover Defender 110 gets a 11.4-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E stands out with head-up display and Bang & Olufsen audio that you will not find on the Land Rover Defender 110. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Ford Mustang Mach-E gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Land Rover Defender 110 offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 3-zone in the Land Rover Defender 110.

Drivetrain

The Ford Mustang Mach-E uses a Electric Motor producing 198kW and 580Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.

The Land Rover Defender 110 responds with a 3.0 i6 Diesel Mild Hybrid making 183kW and 570Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.3 seconds.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the clear power advantage at 198kW vs 183kW. In the real-world sprint, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Mustang Mach-E measures 4,713mm long on a 2,984mm wheelbase, 45mm shorter than the Land Rover Defender 110 at 4,758mm (3,022mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Defender 110 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 402L in the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 972L in the Land Rover Defender 110, giving the Land Rover Defender 110 a 570L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.8m diameter

Large

Land Rover Defender 110 S D250
12.8m
Land Rover Defender 110
12.8m · Large

Based on 12.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Mustang Mach-E) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Defender 110). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Mustang Mach-E if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Land Rover Defender 110 if: You need more boot space, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Mustang Mach-E takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Defender 110 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Mustang Mach-E and Land Rover Defender 110?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the cheapest at $86,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Land Rover Defender 110 by $13,910.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Land Rover Defender 110 uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Ford Mustang Mach-E and Land Rover Defender 110 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Land Rover Defender 110 has the largest boot at 972L.

Which can tow the most?

The Land Rover Defender 110 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E makes the most power at 198kW. The Ford Mustang Mach-E is quickest to 100km/h in 7s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs