Land Rover Defender 110 vs Volvo XC90
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Land Rover Defender 110
From $100,900
SUV
3.0 i6 Diesel Mild Hybrid
183kW
8.1 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
972L

Volvo XC90
From $97,990
SUV
2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5
183kW
8.4 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
810L
Price Breakdown
The Land Rover Defender 110 starts from $100,900 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC90 opens at $97,990. That makes the Volvo XC90 the more affordable entry point by $2,910.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $110,990 and $107,789 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Land Rover Defender 110 features a 11.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volvo XC90 gets a 11.2-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Land Rover Defender 110 stands out with ventilated seats that you will not find on the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 counters with head-up display, panoramic roof and Bowers & Wilkins audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Land Rover Defender 110 uses a 3.0 i6 Diesel Mild Hybrid producing 183kW and 570Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.3 seconds.
The Volvo XC90 responds with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5 making 183kW and 350Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.6 seconds.
Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the real-world sprint, the Volvo XC90 is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Land Rover Defender 110 measures 4,758mm long on a 3,022mm wheelbase, 195mm shorter than the Volvo XC90 at 4,953mm (2,984mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Defender 110 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 972L in the Land Rover Defender 110 and 810L in the Volvo XC90, giving the Land Rover Defender 110 a 162L advantage. The Volvo XC90 seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Land Rover Defender 110 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,400kg. That 1,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.4m to 12.8m
Based on 12.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Land Rover Defender 110 and $2,394/year for the Volvo XC90. That is a $85 annual difference in favour of the Land Rover Defender 110.
Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Land Rover Defender 110) vs $2,394 (Volvo XC90). The Land Rover Defender 110 saves you roughly $85 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Defender 110) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC90). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Land Rover Defender 110 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Volvo XC90 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Land Rover Defender 110 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Land Rover Defender 110 will save you roughly $85 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Defender 110 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Land Rover Defender 110 and Volvo XC90?
The Volvo XC90 is the cheapest at $97,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Land Rover Defender 110 by $2,910.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Land Rover Defender 110 uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Land Rover Defender 110 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Land Rover Defender 110 has the largest boot at 972L.
Which can tow the most?
The Land Rover Defender 110 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!









