Ford Mustang Mach-E vs MINI Aceman
Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 27 Sep 2026, price 4 Oct 2026
Track the Ford Mustang Mach-E & MINI Aceman
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Ford Mustang Mach-E starts from $65,990 before on-road costs, while the MINI Aceman opens at $60,990. That makes the MINI Aceman the more affordable entry point by $5,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $72,589 and $67,089 respectively.
Both models currently qualify for the electric-vehicle Fringe Benefits Tax exemption (battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold; battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold), a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases.
Safety Rundown
Both the Ford Mustang Mach-E and MINI Aceman hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 83% for the MINI Aceman.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 8 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Ford Mustang Mach-E, against 7 on the MINI Aceman.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.
Recalls on our record
Ford Mustang Mach-E
- REC-006732 · published 28 Sep 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, the rear quarter glass trim moulding may detach from the vehicle while driving.Year range on the notice: 2023
- REC-006675 · published 23 Jul 2026Due to a manufacturing issue, the rear differential pinion shaft could break, resulting in a loss of motive power or loss of the park function when the vehicle is stationary.Year range on the notice: 2021 - 2023
- REC-006648 · published 1 Jul 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, Advanced Driver Assistance System may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025 - 2026
- 6 more on the model page.
MINI Aceman
None open on our record
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
73kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 150kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 150kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
How long to charge
49.2kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 95kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 95kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Ford Mustang Mach-E features a 15.5-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.2-inch digital dash, while the MINI Aceman gets a 9.4-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E stands out with heated front seats, power tailgate and Bang & Olufsen audio — features our data doesn't list for the MINI Aceman. The MINI Aceman counters with Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Ford Mustang Mach-E gets synthetic leather upholstery while the MINI Aceman offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The Ford Mustang Mach-E uses a Electric Motor producing 212kW and 525Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.
The MINI Aceman responds with a Electric making 160kW and 330Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.1 seconds.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the clear power advantage at 212kW vs 160kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Ford Mustang Mach-E is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 73kWh (Ford Mustang Mach-E) vs 54.2kWh (MINI Aceman), giving WLTP ranges of 470km and 352km. DC fast charging peaks at 150kW (Ford Mustang Mach-E) vs 95kW (MINI Aceman).
Space & Comfort
The Ford Mustang Mach-E measures 4,713mm long on a 2,984mm wheelbase, 640mm longer than the MINI Aceman at 4,073mm (2,606mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Mustang Mach-E generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 402L in the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 300L in the MINI Aceman, giving the Ford Mustang Mach-E a 102L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.1m diameter
Average
Based on 11.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Average
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 10.0 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.8 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Mustang Mach-E) vs 5 years / 999,999km (MINI Aceman). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Mustang Mach-E if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the MINI Aceman if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer MINI's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
MINI Aceman: Top CarSorted Score, 73 vs 68
The MINI Aceman comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (73 vs 68), taking 1 of 8 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: energy efficiency (MINI Aceman ahead by 35), safety (MINI Aceman ahead by 19), technology (Ford Mustang Mach-E ahead by 16). If boot space matters, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Mustang Mach-E and MINI Aceman?
The MINI Aceman is the cheapest at $60,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Mustang Mach-E by $5,000.
Which has the longest driving range?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the most range at 470km (WLTP).
Which charges fastest?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E accepts the highest DC charging at up to 150kW.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched on crash rating: Ford Mustang Mach-E and MINI Aceman all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the largest boot at 402L with the seats up.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E makes the most power at 212kW. The Ford Mustang Mach-E is quickest to 100km/h in 7s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
