Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota LandCruiser 300
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Ford Mustang Mach-E starts from $86,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 opens at $97,990. That makes the Ford Mustang Mach-E the more affordable entry point by $11,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $95,689 and $107,789 respectively.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Toyota LandCruiser 300, as a petrol model, does not qualify.
Safety Rundown
Both the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota LandCruiser 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 85% for the Toyota LandCruiser 300.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota LandCruiser 300 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Ford Mustang Mach-E.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. The Ford Mustang Mach-E adds a 360-degree camera that the Toyota LandCruiser 300 misses.
Feature Showdown
The Ford Mustang Mach-E features a 15.5-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.2-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E stands out with head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and Bang & Olufsen audio that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 300. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Ford Mustang Mach-E gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Ford Mustang Mach-E uses a Electric Motor producing 198kW and 580Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 responds with a Diesel Twin-Turbo V6 making 227kW and 700Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the clear power advantage at 227kW vs 198kW. In the real-world sprint, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford Mustang Mach-E measures 4,713mm long on a 2,984mm wheelbase, 267mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 300 at 4,980mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Mustang Mach-E generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 402L in the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 700L in the Toyota LandCruiser 300, giving the Toyota LandCruiser 300 a 298L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m diameter
Average
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Mustang Mach-E) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 300). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Mustang Mach-E if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 300 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota LandCruiser 300 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota LandCruiser 300?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the cheapest at $86,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser 300 by $11,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 uses the least fuel at 10.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota LandCruiser 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the largest boot at 700L.
Which can tow the most?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Toyota LandCruiser 300 makes the most power at 227kW. The Ford Mustang Mach-E is quickest to 100km/h in 7s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
