CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo EX60
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo EX60

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordVolvo
Price (RRP)$80,490$86,990
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)540km610km
Battery91 kWh83 kWh
Power212kW275kW
0-100 km/h7s5.9s
Max DC Charge150kW
10-80% Charge Time28 min26 min
Boot Space402L523L
Towing2,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Ford Mustang Mach-E & Volvo EX60

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ford Mustang Mach-E starts from $80,490 before on-road costs, while the Volvo EX60 opens at $86,990. That makes the Ford Mustang Mach-E the more affordable entry point by $6,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $88,539 and $95,689 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

88kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 24m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 150kW · 0–80%

35 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 150kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

83kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (22kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Mustang Mach-E features a 15.5-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.2-inch digital dash, while the Volvo EX60 gets a 15-inch display and 11.4-inch instruments.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging and Bang & Olufsen audio that you will not find on the Volvo EX60. The Volvo EX60 counters with panoramic roof and Bowers & Wilkins audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Ford Mustang Mach-E gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Volvo EX60 offers nordico. Climate control is 2-zone in the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 3-zone in the Volvo EX60.

Drivetrain

The Ford Mustang Mach-E uses a Electric Motor producing 212kW and 525Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.

The Volvo EX60 responds with a Electric making 275kW and 480Nm, paired to a single-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.9 seconds.

The Volvo EX60 has the clear power advantage at 275kW vs 212kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volvo EX60 is 1.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 91kWh (Ford Mustang Mach-E) vs 83kWh (Volvo EX60), giving WLTP ranges of 540km and 610km.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Mustang Mach-E measures 4,713mm long on a 2,984mm wheelbase, 90mm shorter than the Volvo EX60 at 4,803mm (2,970mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Mustang Mach-E generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 402L in the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 523L in the Volvo EX60, giving the Volvo EX60 a 121L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m diameter

Good

Volvo EX60 P6 Electric
11.0m
Volvo EX60 P6 Electric
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Mustang Mach-E) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo EX60). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Mustang Mach-E if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo EX60 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volvo EX60 takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Volvo EX60 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Mustang Mach-E and Volvo EX60?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the cheapest at $80,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volvo EX60 by $6,500.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Volvo EX60 has the most range at 610km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E accepts the highest DC charging at up to 150kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Ford Mustang Mach-E all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volvo EX60 has the largest boot at 523L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volvo EX60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo EX60 makes the most power at 275kW. The Volvo EX60 is quickest to 100km/h in 5.9s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs