CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Mustang vs Nissan Patrol
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Mustang vs Nissan Patrol

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordNissan
Price (RRP)$72,990$90,600
Power232kW298kW
0-100 km/h11.5s
Fuel Economy9.4 L/100km14.4 L/100km
Boot Space620L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty5yr / unlimited5yr / 300k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Ford Mustang starts from $72,990 before on-road costs, while the Nissan Patrol opens at $90,600. That makes the Ford Mustang the more affordable entry point by $17,610.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $80,289 and $99,660 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Ford Mustang by roughly $7,125 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Mustang features a 13.2-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.4-inch digital dash, while the Nissan Patrol gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Mustang stands out with heated front seats, ventilated seats, Bang & Olufsen audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Nissan Patrol. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Mustang uses a Petrol I4 Turbo producing 232kW and 475Nm of torque, sent through a 10-speed automatic to a RWD layout.

The Nissan Patrol responds with a Petrol making 298kW and 560Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.

The Nissan Patrol has the clear power advantage at 298kW vs 232kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Mustang measures 4,811mm long on a 2,719mm wheelbase, 364mm shorter than the Nissan Patrol at 5,175mm (3,075mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan Patrol generally means more rear legroom.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.5m to 12.6m

Ford Mustang EcoBoost Fastback
11.5mTighter
Best
Nissan Patrol Ti
12.6m
Worst
Ford Mustang
11.5m · Average

Based on 11.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Nissan Patrol
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,679/year for the Ford Mustang and $4,104/year for the Nissan Patrol. That is a $1,425 annual difference in favour of the Ford Mustang.

Estimated annual total: $2,679 (Ford Mustang) vs $4,104 (Nissan Patrol). The Ford Mustang saves you roughly $1,425 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years (Ford Mustang) vs 5 years / 300,000km (Nissan Patrol). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Mustang if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Nissan Patrol if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Mustang takes 2 of 3 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Ford Mustang will save you roughly $1,425 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · All SUVs