CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Ranger vs Subaru WRX Sportswagon
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Ranger vs Subaru WRX Sportswagon

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordSubaru
Price (RRP)$37,130$52,290
Power125kW202kW
0-100 km/h10.5s6.4s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km8.5 L/100km
Boot Space441L
Towing3,500kg1,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars4 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Ford Ranger starts from $37,130 before on-road costs, while the Subaru WRX Sportswagon opens at $52,290. That makes the Ford Ranger the more affordable entry point by $15,160.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,843 and $57,519 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Ford Ranger by roughly $2,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

The Ford Ranger holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Subaru WRX Sportswagon.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Ford Ranger and 8 in the Subaru WRX Sportswagon.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Ranger features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Subaru WRX Sportswagon gets a 11.6-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Ranger stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Subaru WRX Sportswagon. The Subaru WRX Sportswagon counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Ranger uses a Diesel Turbo producing 125kW and 405Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Subaru WRX Sportswagon responds with a Petrol making 202kW and 350Nm, paired to a cvt driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.4 seconds.

The Subaru WRX Sportswagon has the clear power advantage at 202kW vs 125kW. In the real-world sprint, the Subaru WRX Sportswagon is 4.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Ranger measures 5,225mm long on a 3,270mm wheelbase, 555mm longer than the Subaru WRX Sportswagon at 4,670mm (2,670mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Ranger generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the Ford Ranger leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 2,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 12.9m

Subaru WRX Sportswagon AWD Sport Lineartronic
11.0mTighter
Best
Ford Ranger XL 4x2 Hi-Rider Single Cab Cab-Chassis
12.9m
Worst
Ford Ranger
12.9m · Large

Based on 12.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Subaru WRX Sportswagon
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Ford Ranger and $2,423/year for the Subaru WRX Sportswagon. That is a $456 annual difference in favour of the Ford Ranger.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Ford Ranger) vs $2,423 (Subaru WRX Sportswagon). The Ford Ranger saves you roughly $456 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Ranger) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru WRX Sportswagon). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Ranger if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Subaru WRX Sportswagon if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Ranger takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Ford Ranger will save you roughly $456 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Ranger and Subaru WRX Sportswagon?

The Ford Ranger is the cheapest at $37,130 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Subaru WRX Sportswagon by $15,160.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford Ranger uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Ford Ranger has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Subaru WRX Sportswagon has the largest boot at 441L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Ranger has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Subaru WRX Sportswagon makes the most power at 202kW. The Subaru WRX Sportswagon is quickest to 100km/h in 6.4s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Cab Chassiss · All Wagons