CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSubaru WRX Sportswagon vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Subaru WRX Sportswagon vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSubaruMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$52,290$53,990
Range (WLTP)84km
Battery20 kWh
Power202kW98kW
0-100 km/h6.4s8.7s
Max DC Charge50kW
10-80% Charge Time38 min
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km7.3 L/100km
Boot Space441L478L
Towing1,000kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety4 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Subaru WRX Sportswagon starts from $52,290 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV opens at $53,990. That makes the Subaru WRX Sportswagon the more affordable entry point by $1,700.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $57,519 and $59,389 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Subaru WRX Sportswagon.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Subaru WRX Sportswagon.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Subaru WRX Sportswagon and 7 in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.

Feature Showdown

The Subaru WRX Sportswagon features a 11.6-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV counters with power tailgate that the Subaru WRX Sportswagon does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Subaru WRX Sportswagon uses a Petrol producing 202kW and 350Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.4 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV responds with a Petrol making 98kW and 195Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.

The Subaru WRX Sportswagon has the clear power advantage at 202kW vs 98kW. In the real-world sprint, the Subaru WRX Sportswagon is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Subaru WRX Sportswagon measures 4,670mm long on a 2,670mm wheelbase, 40mm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV at 4,710mm (2,705mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 441L in the Subaru WRX Sportswagon and 478L in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, giving the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV a 37L advantage. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.0m

Subaru WRX Sportswagon AWD Sport Lineartronic
11.0mTighter
Best
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV ES
11.0m
Best
Subaru WRX Sportswagon
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Subaru WRX Sportswagon and $2,081/year for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.

Estimated annual total: $2,423 (Subaru WRX Sportswagon) vs $2,081 (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV). The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru WRX Sportswagon) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV). The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Subaru WRX Sportswagon if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV takes 5 of 8 key spec categories. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Wagons · All SUVs