CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFoton Tunland vs Volkswagen Amarok
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Foton Tunland vs Volkswagen Amarok

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFotonVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$39,990$55,990
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power120kW125kW
0-100 km/h11s
10-80% Charge Time45 min
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km8 L/100km
Boot Space543L
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Foton Tunland & Volkswagen Amarok

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Foton Tunland starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen Amarok opens at $55,990. That makes the Foton Tunland the more affordable entry point by $16,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $61,589 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Foton Tunland features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen Amarok gets a 10.1-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Foton Tunland gets leatherette upholstery while the Volkswagen Amarok offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Foton Tunland uses a Turbo-diesel mild hybrid producing 120kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.

The Volkswagen Amarok responds with a Diesel making 125kW and 405Nm, paired to a auto driving all four wheels.

The Volkswagen Amarok has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Foton Tunland measures 5,617mm long on a 3,355mm wheelbase, 267mm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok at 5,350mm (3,270mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Foton Tunland generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Volkswagen Amarok leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.8m to 13.5m

TightestVolkswagen Amarok Core TDI405Tightest turn at 12.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volkswagen Amarok Core TDI405
12.8mTighter
Best
Foton Tunland V7-C 4x2
13.5m
Worst
Foton Tunland V7-C 4x2
13.5m · Large

Based on 13.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen Amarok Core TDI405
12.8m · Large

Based on 12.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolkswagen AmarokTightest turn at 12.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Foton Tunland13.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Volkswagen AmarokTightest12.8 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Foton Tunland and $2,280/year for the Volkswagen Amarok. That is a $29 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Amarok.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Foton Tunland) vs $2,280 (Volkswagen Amarok). The Volkswagen Amarok saves you roughly $29 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years (Foton Tunland) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen Amarok). The Foton Tunland has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Foton Tunland)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Foton Tunland if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, or prefer Foton's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen Amarok if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Foton Tunland and Volkswagen Amarok trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Volkswagen Amarok will save you roughly $29 a year in fuel. The Foton Tunland adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Foton Tunland and Volkswagen Amarok?

The Foton Tunland is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volkswagen Amarok by $16,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen Amarok uses the least fuel at 8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Volkswagen Amarok all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Foton Tunland has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Foton Tunland has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volkswagen Amarok makes the most power at 125kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia