CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Foton Tunland vs Mitsubishi Triton
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Foton Tunland vs Mitsubishi Triton

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 13 Aug 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Foton TunlandV7-C 4x28?04
Mitsubishi TritonGLX 4x28?04

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecFotonMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$39,990$43,690
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power120kW150kW
0-100 km/h11s11.3s
10-80% Charge Time45 min—
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km7.5 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / No data10yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Foton Tunland & Mitsubishi Triton

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Foton Tunland starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Triton opens at $43,690. That makes the Foton Tunland the more affordable entry point by $3,700.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $48,059 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Foton Tunland

None open on our record

Mitsubishi Triton

  • REC-005634 · published 20 Mar 2023The product was sold without the warning information that is required for products containing button/coin batteries.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2022
  • REC-001049 · published 6 May 2019The rivets for the side step cover may corrode and fracture, especially if usage involves exposure to salt or anti-freeze agent.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2017
  • REC-001032 · published 29 Jun 2016The turn signal and lighting switch connector terminals may become worn during switch operation due to insufficient rigidity.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • 3 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Foton Tunland features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi Triton gets a 9-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Foton Tunland gets leatherette upholstery while the Mitsubishi Triton offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Foton Tunland uses a Turbo-diesel mild hybrid producing 120kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Triton responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 470Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.3 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Triton has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 120kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Foton Tunland is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Foton Tunland measures 5,617mm long on a 3,355mm wheelbase, 297mm longer than the Mitsubishi Triton at 5,320mm (3,130mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Foton Tunland generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Triton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.4m to 13.5m

TightestMitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2Tightest turn at 12.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2
12.4mTighter
Best
Foton Tunland V7-C 4x2
13.5m
Worst
Foton Tunland V7-C 4x2
13.5m · Large

Based on 13.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi TritonTightest turn at 12.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Foton Tunland13.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Mitsubishi TritonTightest12.4 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Foton Tunland and $2,138/year for the Mitsubishi Triton. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Triton.

Warranty: 7 years (Foton Tunland) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Foton Tunland)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Foton Tunland if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Foton's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Mitsubishi Triton: Top CarSorted Score, 66 vs 62, but the Foton Tunland is $3,700 cheaper

The Mitsubishi Triton comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (66 vs 62), taking 3 of 5 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Mitsubishi Triton ahead by 14), reliability (Mitsubishi Triton ahead by 9), performance (Mitsubishi Triton ahead by 6). The Mitsubishi Triton will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Foton Tunland and Mitsubishi Triton?

The Foton Tunland is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi Triton by $3,700.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Triton uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Mitsubishi Triton holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Foton Tunland, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Foton Tunland has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi Triton makes the most power at 150kW. The Foton Tunland is quickest to 100km/h in 11s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia