CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFoton Tunland vs Mitsubishi Triton
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Foton Tunland vs Mitsubishi Triton

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFotonMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$39,990$43,690
Range (WLTP)330km
Battery88.6 kWh
Power120kW150kW
0-100 km/h11s11.3s
Max DC Charge80kW
10-80% Charge Time45 min
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / unlimited10yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Foton Tunland starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Triton opens at $43,690. That makes the Foton Tunland the more affordable entry point by $3,700.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $48,059 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Triton by roughly $1,000 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Foton Tunland features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi Triton gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Foton Tunland uses a Turbo-diesel mild hybrid producing 120kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Triton responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 470Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.3 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Triton has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Foton Tunland is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Foton Tunland measures 5,365mm long on a 3,155mm wheelbase, 45mm longer than the Mitsubishi Triton at 5,320mm (3,130mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Foton Tunland generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the Mitsubishi Triton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.4m to 12.6m

Mitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2
12.4mTighter
Best
Foton Tunland V7-C 4x2
12.6m
Worst
Foton Tunland
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Triton
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Foton Tunland and $2,109/year for the Mitsubishi Triton. That is a $200 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Triton.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Foton Tunland) vs $2,109 (Mitsubishi Triton). The Mitsubishi Triton saves you roughly $200 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years (Foton Tunland) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Foton Tunland)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Foton Tunland if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Foton's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi Triton takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Mitsubishi Triton will save you roughly $200 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Foton Tunland and Mitsubishi Triton?

The Foton Tunland is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi Triton by $3,700.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Triton uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Triton all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Foton Tunland has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi Triton makes the most power at 150kW. The Foton Tunland is quickest to 100km/h in 11s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes