CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG U9 vs Mitsubishi Triton
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG U9 vs Mitsubishi Triton

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$52,990$43,690
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power160kW150kW
0-100 km/h11.3s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km7.5 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the MG U9 & Mitsubishi Triton

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The MG U9 starts from $52,990 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Triton opens at $43,690. That makes the Mitsubishi Triton the more affordable entry point by $9,300.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $58,289 and $48,059 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the MG U9 and Mitsubishi Triton hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MG U9 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Mitsubishi Triton.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the MG U9 and 7 in the Mitsubishi Triton.

Feature Showdown

The MG U9 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi Triton gets a 9-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG U9 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Triton. The Mitsubishi Triton counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the MG U9 gets artificial leather upholstery while the Mitsubishi Triton offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the MG U9 and 1-zone in the Mitsubishi Triton.

Drivetrain

The MG U9 uses a 2.5L Turbo Diesel producing 160kW and 520Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout.

The Mitsubishi Triton responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 470Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.3 seconds.

The MG U9 has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG U9 measures 5,500mm long on a 3,300mm wheelbase, 180mm longer than the Mitsubishi Triton at 5,320mm (3,130mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG U9 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Triton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.4m to 13.3m

Mitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2
12.4mTighter
Best
MG U9 Explore
13.3m
Worst
MG U9 Explore
13.3m · Large

Based on 13.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the MG U9 and $2,138/year for the Mitsubishi Triton. That is a $114 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Triton.

Estimated annual total: $2,252 (MG U9) vs $2,138 (Mitsubishi Triton). The Mitsubishi Triton saves you roughly $114 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years (MG U9) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG U9 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi Triton takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi Triton will save you roughly $114 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG U9 and Mitsubishi Triton?

The Mitsubishi Triton is the cheapest at $43,690 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG U9 by $9,300.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Triton uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MG U9 and Mitsubishi Triton all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The MG U9 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG U9 makes the most power at 160kW.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia