CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGenesis G80 vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Genesis G80 vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance

Two electric Sedans go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGenesisMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$155,000$189,900
Range (WLTP)570km
Battery94.5 kWh6.1 kWh
Power272kW500kW
0-100 km/h5.1s3.4s
Max DC Charge350kW
10-80% Charge Time25 min
Fuel Economy6.9 kWh/100km
Boot Space334L359L
Towing2,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars
V2LYesNo

Price Breakdown

The Genesis G80 starts from $155,000 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance opens at $189,900. That makes the Genesis G80 the more affordable entry point by $34,900.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $170,500 and $208,890 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

Both the Genesis G80 and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Genesis G80 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. The Genesis G80 adds a 360-degree camera that the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance misses.

Feature Showdown

The Genesis G80 features a 14.5-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance gets a 11.9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Genesis G80 stands out with wireless charging, V2L, Bang & Olufsen audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance counters with panoramic roof and Burmester audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Genesis G80 uses a Electric producing 272kW and 700Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.1 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance responds with a Hybrid making 500kW and 1020Nm, paired to a 9-speed auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 3.4 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the clear power advantage at 500kW vs 272kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 94.5kWh (Genesis G80) vs 6.1kWh (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance).

Space & Comfort

The Genesis G80 measures 5,135mm long on a 3,140mm wheelbase, 293mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance at 4,842mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Genesis G80 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 334L in the Genesis G80 and 359L in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance, giving the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance a 25L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.7m diameter

Average

Genesis G80 Electrified Signature AWD
11.7m
Genesis G80
11.7m · Average

Based on 11.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Genesis G80) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Genesis G80 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Genesis's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Genesis G80 and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Genesis G80 and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance?

The Genesis G80 is the cheapest at $155,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance by $34,900.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Genesis G80 and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the largest boot at 359L.

Which can tow the most?

The Genesis G80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance makes the most power at 500kW. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is quickest to 100km/h in 3.4s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans