GWM Haval H6 vs Mazda CX-60
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The GWM Haval H6 starts from $35,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $44,240. That makes the GWM Haval H6 the more affordable entry point by $8,250.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $39,589 and $48,664 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GWM Haval H6 by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the GWM Haval H6 and Mazda CX-60 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 90% for the GWM Haval H6 and 91% for the Mazda CX-60.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Haval H6 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-60.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GWM Haval H6 and 6 in the Mazda CX-60.
Feature Showdown
The GWM Haval H6 features a 14.6-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GWM Haval H6 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, panoramic roof and power tailgate that you will not find on the Mazda CX-60. The Mazda CX-60 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The GWM Haval H6 uses a Petrol producing 170kW and 380Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.
The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.
The GWM Haval H6 has the clear power advantage at 170kW vs 138kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 1.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The GWM Haval H6 measures 4,703mm long on a 2,738mm wheelbase, 42mm shorter than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,745mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 471L in the GWM Haval H6 and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 99L advantage.
For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.4m to 12.0m
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the GWM Haval H6 and $1,910/year for the Mazda CX-60. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the GWM Haval H6.
Estimated annual total: $1,682 (GWM Haval H6) vs $1,910 (Mazda CX-60). The GWM Haval H6 saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H6) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60). The GWM Haval H6 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the GWM Haval H6 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The GWM Haval H6 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The GWM Haval H6 will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The GWM Haval H6 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, GWM Haval H6 and Mazda CX-60?
The GWM Haval H6 is the cheapest at $35,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-60 by $8,250.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The GWM Haval H6 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — GWM Haval H6 and Mazda CX-60 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Haval H6 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Haval H6 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The GWM Haval H6 makes the most power at 170kW. The Mazda CX-60 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
