CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGWM Tank 300 vs Volvo EX30
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Tank 300 vs Volvo EX30

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGWMVolvo
Price (RRP)$49,990$49,990
Range (WLTP)462km
Battery69 kWh
Power167kW200kW
0-100 km/h9.5s5.3s
Max DC Charge153kW
10-80% Charge Time26 min
Fuel Economy9.5 L/100km
Boot Space550L318L
Towing2,000kg1,600kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The GWM Tank 300 starts from $49,990 before on-road costs, while the Volvo EX30 opens at $49,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $54,989 and $54,989 respectively.

The Volvo EX30 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The GWM Tank 300, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the GWM Tank 300 and Volvo EX30 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the GWM Tank 300 and 88% for the Volvo EX30.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Tank 300 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Volvo EX30.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GWM Tank 300 and 6 in the Volvo EX30.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Tank 300 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volvo EX30 gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Tank 300 stands out with panoramic roof that you will not find on the Volvo EX30. The Volvo EX30 counters with head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GWM Tank 300 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Volvo EX30 offers nordico/microtech fabric.

Drivetrain

The GWM Tank 300 uses a Petrol producing 167kW and 387Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.5 seconds.

The Volvo EX30 responds with a Electric making 200kW and 343Nm, paired to a single-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.3 seconds.

The Volvo EX30 has the clear power advantage at 200kW vs 167kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volvo EX30 is 4.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Tank 300 measures 4,715mm long on a 2,750mm wheelbase, 482mm longer than the Volvo EX30 at 4,233mm (2,650mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Tank 300 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 550L in the GWM Tank 300 and 318L in the Volvo EX30, giving the GWM Tank 300 a 232L advantage.

For towing, the GWM Tank 300 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 12.0m

Volvo EX30 Plus Single Motor
10.4mTighter
Best
GWM Tank 300 Lux
12.0m
Worst
GWM Tank 300
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo EX30
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 300) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo EX30). The GWM Tank 300 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Tank 300 if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo EX30 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Tank 300 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the GWM Tank 300 has a clear edge. The GWM Tank 300 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM Tank 300 and Volvo EX30?

The GWM Tank 300 is the cheapest at $49,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Tank 300 uses the least fuel at 9.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GWM Tank 300 and Volvo EX30 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Tank 300 has the largest boot at 550L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Tank 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GWM Tank 300 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo EX30 makes the most power at 200kW. The Volvo EX30 is quickest to 100km/h in 5.3s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs