Honda CR-V vs GWM Tank 300
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Honda CR-V starts from $39,900 before on-road costs, while the GWM Tank 300 opens at $49,990. That makes the Honda CR-V the more affordable entry point by $10,090.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,890 and $54,989 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Honda CR-V by roughly $3,990 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Honda CR-V and GWM Tank 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the Honda CR-V and 88% for the GWM Tank 300.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Tank 300 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Honda CR-V.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 11 in the Honda CR-V and 6 in the GWM Tank 300.
Feature Showdown
The Honda CR-V features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the GWM Tank 300 gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Honda CR-V stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the GWM Tank 300. The GWM Tank 300 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and panoramic roof. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Honda CR-V uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 240Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.2 seconds.
The GWM Tank 300 responds with a Petrol making 167kW and 387Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.
The GWM Tank 300 has the clear power advantage at 167kW vs 140kW. In the real-world sprint, the Honda CR-V is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Honda CR-V measures 4,704mm long on a 2,701mm wheelbase, 11mm shorter than the GWM Tank 300 at 4,715mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Tank 300 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 561L in the Honda CR-V and 550L in the GWM Tank 300, giving the Honda CR-V a 11L advantage.
For towing, the GWM Tank 300 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.0m to 12.0m
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the Honda CR-V and $2,708/year for the GWM Tank 300. That is a $798 annual difference in favour of the Honda CR-V.
Estimated annual total: $1,910 (Honda CR-V) vs $2,708 (GWM Tank 300). The Honda CR-V saves you roughly $798 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Honda CR-V) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 300). The GWM Tank 300 has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 5yr (Honda CR-V)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Honda CR-V if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the GWM Tank 300 if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Honda CR-V takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Honda CR-V will save you roughly $798 a year in fuel. The GWM Tank 300 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Honda CR-V and GWM Tank 300?
The Honda CR-V is the cheapest at $39,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Tank 300 by $10,090.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Honda CR-V uses the least fuel at 6.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Honda CR-V and GWM Tank 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Honda CR-V has the largest boot at 561L.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Tank 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Tank 300 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The GWM Tank 300 makes the most power at 167kW. The Honda CR-V is quickest to 100km/h in 8.2s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
