CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai IONIQ 5 vs Mazda CX-90
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai IONIQ 5 vs Mazda CX-90

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHyundaiMazda
Price (RRP)$71,990$74,385
Range (WLTP)433km
Battery77.4 kWh
Power168kW254kW
0-100 km/h8.5s7.8s
Max DC Charge220kW
10-80% Charge Time18 min
Fuel Economy8.2 L/100km
Boot Space527L257L
Towing1,600kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Hyundai IONIQ 5 starts from $71,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-90 opens at $74,385. That makes the Hyundai IONIQ 5 the more affordable entry point by $2,395.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $79,189 and $81,824 respectively.

The Hyundai IONIQ 5 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda CX-90, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Hyundai IONIQ 5 and Mazda CX-90 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 97% for the Hyundai IONIQ 5 and 91% for the Mazda CX-90.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Hyundai IONIQ 5 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Mazda CX-90.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Hyundai IONIQ 5 and 6 in the Mazda CX-90. The Hyundai IONIQ 5 adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-90 misses.

Feature Showdown

The Hyundai IONIQ 5 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-90 gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Hyundai IONIQ 5 stands out with head-up display, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats and BOSE audio that you will not find on the Mazda CX-90. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai IONIQ 5 uses a Electric producing 168kW and 350Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-90 responds with a Petrol making 254kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.

The Mazda CX-90 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 168kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-90 is 0.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai IONIQ 5 measures 4,635mm long on a 3,000mm wheelbase, 465mm shorter than the Mazda CX-90 at 5,100mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-90 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 527L in the Hyundai IONIQ 5 and 257L in the Mazda CX-90, giving the Hyundai IONIQ 5 a 270L advantage. The Mazda CX-90 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mazda CX-90 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 12.0m

Hyundai IONIQ 5 Dynamiq RWD
11.0mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-90 G50e Touring
12.0m
Worst
Hyundai IONIQ 5
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-90
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai IONIQ 5) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-90). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai IONIQ 5 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-90 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Hyundai IONIQ 5 and Mazda CX-90 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Hyundai IONIQ 5 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai IONIQ 5 and Mazda CX-90?

The Hyundai IONIQ 5 is the cheapest at $71,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-90 by $2,395.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-90 uses the least fuel at 8.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Hyundai IONIQ 5 and Mazda CX-90 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Hyundai IONIQ 5 has the largest boot at 527L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-90 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-90 makes the most power at 254kW. The Mazda CX-90 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.8s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs