CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIsuzu MU-X vs Mazda CX-9
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu MU-X vs Mazda CX-9

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecIsuzuMazda
Price (RRP)$43,900TBC
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power120kW204kW
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km11.2 L/100km
Boot Space311L267L
Towing3,500kg2,000kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km3yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Isuzu MU-X & Mazda CX-9

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Isuzu MU-X features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-9 gets a 7-inch display.

The Isuzu MU-X stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Mazda CX-9. The Mazda CX-9 counters with heated front seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu MU-X uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout.

The Mazda CX-9 lines up making 204kW and 367Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic (activematic) driving all four wheels.

The Mazda CX-9 has the clear power advantage at 204kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Isuzu MU-X measures 4,860mm long on a 2,855mm wheelbase, 239mm shorter than the Mazda CX-9 at 5,099mm (2,875mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-9 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 311L in the Isuzu MU-X and 267L in the Mazda CX-9, giving the Isuzu MU-X a 44L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 2138L vs 928L.

For towing, the Isuzu MU-X leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.6m

TightestMazda CX-9 Grand Touring AWDTightest turn at 11.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring AWD
11.4mTighter
Best
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m
Worst
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring AWD
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda CX-9Tightest turn at 11.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Isuzu MU-X11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Mazda CX-9Tightest11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Isuzu MU-X and $3,192/year for the Mazda CX-9. That is a $1,368 annual difference in favour of the Isuzu MU-X.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu MU-X) vs 3 years (Mazda CX-9). The Isuzu MU-X has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-9 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Isuzu MU-X takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The Isuzu MU-X will save you roughly $1,368 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Isuzu MU-X has a clear edge. The Isuzu MU-X adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Isuzu MU-X and Mazda CX-9?

The Isuzu MU-X is the cheapest at $43,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Isuzu MU-X uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Isuzu MU-X holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mazda CX-9, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Isuzu MU-X has the largest boot at 311L.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu MU-X has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Isuzu MU-X has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-9 makes the most power at 204kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs