CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIsuzu MU-X vs Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu MU-X vs Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace: we're still completing price, kerb weight and warranty.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecIsuzuVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$43,900TBC
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power120kW132kW
0-100 km/h11s8.2s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km7.9 L/100km
Boot Space311L230L
Towing3,500kg2,400kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Isuzu MU-X & Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Isuzu MU-X and Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Isuzu MU-X and 96% for the Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Isuzu MU-X packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Isuzu MU-X and 7 in the Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace.

Feature Showdown

The Isuzu MU-X features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Isuzu MU-X stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace. The Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace counters with Apple CarPlay and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu MU-X uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.

The Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace responds with a 2.0 TSI making 132kW and 320Nm, paired to a 7-speed dsg driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.2 seconds.

The Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace has the clear power advantage at 132kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace is 2.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Isuzu MU-X measures 4,860mm long on a 2,855mm wheelbase, 159mm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace at 4,701mm (2,790mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Isuzu MU-X generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 311L in the Isuzu MU-X and 230L in the Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace, giving the Isuzu MU-X a 81L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 2138L vs 700L.

For towing, the Isuzu MU-X leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,400kg. That 1,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 11.9m

TightestIsuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2Tightest turn at 11.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6mTighter
Best
Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace 132TSI Comfortline
11.9m
Worst
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace 132TSI Comfortline
11.9m · Average

Based on 11.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestIsuzu MU-XTightest turn at 11.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Isuzu MU-XTightest11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace11.9 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Isuzu MU-X and $2,252/year for the Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace. That is a $428 annual difference in favour of the Isuzu MU-X.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Isuzu MU-X) vs $2,252 (Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace). The Isuzu MU-X saves you roughly $428 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Isuzu MU-X takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Isuzu MU-X will save you roughly $428 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Isuzu MU-X has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Isuzu MU-X and Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace?

The Isuzu MU-X is the cheapest at $43,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Isuzu MU-X uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Isuzu MU-X and Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Isuzu MU-X has the largest boot at 311L.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu MU-X has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace makes the most power at 132kW. The Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace is quickest to 100km/h in 8.2s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs