Jeep Grand Cherokee L vs Mazda CX-70
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Jeep Grand Cherokee L starts from $69,450 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-70 opens at $76,720. That makes the Jeep Grand Cherokee L the more affordable entry point by $7,270.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $76,395 and $84,392 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-70 by roughly $3,560 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Jeep Grand Cherokee L and Mazda CX-70 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-70 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Jeep Grand Cherokee L.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Jeep Grand Cherokee L and 7 in the Mazda CX-70. The Mazda CX-70 adds a 360-degree camera that the Jeep Grand Cherokee L misses.
Feature Showdown
The Jeep Grand Cherokee L features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-70 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments.
The Jeep Grand Cherokee L stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Mazda CX-70. The Mazda CX-70 counters with head-up display and Bose audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Jeep Grand Cherokee L uses a Petrol V6 Pentastar w/ ESS producing 210kW and 344Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic w/ paddle shifters to a 4WD layout.
The Mazda CX-70 responds with a Petrol making 254kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.
The Mazda CX-70 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 210kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Jeep Grand Cherokee L measures 5,204mm long on a 3,091mm wheelbase, 84mm longer than the Mazda CX-70 at 5,120mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-70 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 487L in the Jeep Grand Cherokee L and 598L in the Mazda CX-70, giving the Mazda CX-70 a 111L advantage. The Jeep Grand Cherokee L seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Jeep Grand Cherokee L leads with a 2,813kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 313kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m to 12.1m
Based on 12.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,021/year for the Jeep Grand Cherokee L and $2,309/year for the Mazda CX-70. That is a $712 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-70.
Estimated annual total: $3,021 (Jeep Grand Cherokee L) vs $2,309 (Mazda CX-70). The Mazda CX-70 saves you roughly $712 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 100,000km (Jeep Grand Cherokee L) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-70). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Jeep Grand Cherokee L if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Jeep's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-70 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-70 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Mazda CX-70 will save you roughly $712 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-70 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Jeep Grand Cherokee L and Mazda CX-70?
The Jeep Grand Cherokee L is the cheapest at $69,450 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-70 by $7,270.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda CX-70 uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Jeep Grand Cherokee L and Mazda CX-70 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-70 has the largest boot at 598L.
Which can tow the most?
The Jeep Grand Cherokee L has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,813kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-70 makes the most power at 254kW.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
