CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Rexton vs Lexus LBX
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Rexton vs Lexus LBX

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMLexus
Price (RRP)$50,000$47,550
Power149kW100kW
0-100 km/h11.5s9.2s
Fuel Economy8.7 L/100km3.8 L/100km
Boot Space236L332L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The KGM Rexton starts from $50,000 before on-road costs, while the Lexus LBX opens at $47,550. That makes the Lexus LBX the more affordable entry point by $2,450.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $55,000 and $52,305 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Lexus LBX by roughly $6,985 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the KGM Rexton and Lexus LBX hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The KGM Rexton packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Lexus LBX.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Rexton features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Lexus LBX gets a 9.8-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Rexton stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Lexus LBX. The Lexus LBX counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the KGM Rexton gets leather upholstery while the Lexus LBX offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The KGM Rexton uses a Turbo DDi Diesel producing 149kW and 441Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.

The Lexus LBX responds with a Hybrid making 100kW and 185Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.2 seconds.

The KGM Rexton has the clear power advantage at 149kW vs 100kW. In the real-world sprint, the Lexus LBX is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Rexton measures 4,850mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 660mm longer than the Lexus LBX at 4,190mm (2,580mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Rexton generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 236L in the KGM Rexton and 332L in the Lexus LBX, giving the Lexus LBX a 96L advantage. The KGM Rexton seats 7 vs 5.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.6m

Lexus LBX Luxury 2WD
10.4mTighter
Best
KGM Rexton ELX
11.6m
Worst
KGM Rexton
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Lexus LBX
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,480/year for the KGM Rexton and $1,083/year for the Lexus LBX. That is a $1,397 annual difference in favour of the Lexus LBX.

Estimated annual total: $2,480 (KGM Rexton) vs $1,083 (Lexus LBX). The Lexus LBX saves you roughly $1,397 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Rexton) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Lexus LBX). The KGM Rexton has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Rexton if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Lexus LBX if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Lexus's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Lexus LBX takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Lexus LBX will save you roughly $1,397 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Lexus LBX has a clear edge. The KGM Rexton adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Rexton and Lexus LBX?

The Lexus LBX is the cheapest at $47,550 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Rexton by $2,450.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Lexus LBX uses the least fuel at 3.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — KGM Rexton and Lexus LBX all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Lexus LBX has the largest boot at 332L.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Rexton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Rexton has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Rexton makes the most power at 149kW. The Lexus LBX is quickest to 100km/h in 9.2s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs