CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Rexton vs GWM Tank 300
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Rexton vs GWM Tank 300

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMGWM
Price (RRP)$50,000$49,990
Power149kW167kW
0-100 km/h11.5s9.5s
Fuel Economy8.7 L/100km9.5 L/100km
Boot Space236L550L
Towing3,500kg2,000kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The KGM Rexton starts from $50,000 before on-road costs, while the GWM Tank 300 opens at $49,990. That makes the GWM Tank 300 the more affordable entry point by $10.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $55,000 and $54,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the KGM Rexton by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the KGM Rexton and GWM Tank 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the KGM Rexton and 6 in the GWM Tank 300.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Rexton features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the GWM Tank 300 gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Rexton stands out with ambient lighting that you will not find on the GWM Tank 300. The GWM Tank 300 counters with panoramic roof. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The KGM Rexton uses a Turbo DDi Diesel producing 149kW and 441Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.

The GWM Tank 300 responds with a Petrol making 167kW and 387Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The GWM Tank 300 has the clear power advantage at 167kW vs 149kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Tank 300 is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Rexton measures 4,850mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 135mm longer than the GWM Tank 300 at 4,715mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Rexton generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 236L in the KGM Rexton and 550L in the GWM Tank 300, giving the GWM Tank 300 a 314L advantage. The KGM Rexton seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the KGM Rexton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 12.0m

KGM Rexton ELX
11.6mTighter
Best
GWM Tank 300 Lux
12.0m
Worst
KGM Rexton
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Tank 300
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,480/year for the KGM Rexton and $2,708/year for the GWM Tank 300. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the KGM Rexton.

Estimated annual total: $2,480 (KGM Rexton) vs $2,708 (GWM Tank 300). The KGM Rexton saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Rexton) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 300). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Rexton if: You want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Tank 300 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Tank 300 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The KGM Rexton will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Tank 300 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs