CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKia Carnival vs GWM Tank 300
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Kia Carnival vs GWM Tank 300

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKiaGWM
Price (RRP)$50,570$49,990
Power216kW167kW
0-100 km/h9.1s9.5s
Fuel Economy9.6 L/100km9.5 L/100km
Boot Space587L550L
Towing2,000kg2,000kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Kia Carnival starts from $50,570 before on-road costs, while the GWM Tank 300 opens at $49,990. That makes the GWM Tank 300 the more affordable entry point by $580.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $55,627 and $54,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Kia Carnival and GWM Tank 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 90% for the Kia Carnival and 88% for the GWM Tank 300.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Tank 300 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Kia Carnival.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Kia Carnival and 6 in the GWM Tank 300.

Feature Showdown

The Kia Carnival features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 4-inch digital dash, while the GWM Tank 300 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Kia Carnival stands out with wireless charging that you will not find on the GWM Tank 300. The GWM Tank 300 counters with panoramic roof. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Kia Carnival gets cloth upholstery while the GWM Tank 300 offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Kia Carnival uses a Petrol producing 216kW and 355Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The GWM Tank 300 responds with a Petrol making 167kW and 387Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Kia Carnival has the clear power advantage at 216kW vs 167kW. In the real-world sprint, the Kia Carnival is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Kia Carnival measures 5,155mm long on a 3,090mm wheelbase, 440mm longer than the GWM Tank 300 at 4,715mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia Carnival generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 587L in the Kia Carnival and 550L in the GWM Tank 300, giving the Kia Carnival a 37L advantage. The Kia Carnival seats 8 vs 5.

For towing, the GWM Tank 300 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.0m to 12.0m

Kia Carnival S Petrol
12.0mTighter
Best
GWM Tank 300 Lux
12.0m
Best
Kia Carnival
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Tank 300
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,736/year for the Kia Carnival and $2,708/year for the GWM Tank 300. That is a $28 annual difference in favour of the GWM Tank 300.

Estimated annual total: $2,736 (Kia Carnival) vs $2,708 (GWM Tank 300). The GWM Tank 300 saves you roughly $28 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Carnival) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 300). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kia Carnival if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Tank 300 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Kia Carnival takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The GWM Tank 300 will save you roughly $28 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia Carnival has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Kia Carnival and GWM Tank 300?

The GWM Tank 300 is the cheapest at $49,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Kia Carnival by $580.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Tank 300 uses the least fuel at 9.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Kia Carnival and GWM Tank 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia Carnival has the largest boot at 587L.

Which can tow the most?

The Kia Carnival has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Kia Carnival makes the most power at 216kW. The Kia Carnival is quickest to 100km/h in 9.1s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All People Movers · All SUVs