Mahindra XUV 3XO vs Mazda CX-30
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Mahindra XUV 3XO & Mazda CX-30
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mahindra XUV 3XO starts from $21,800 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-30 opens at $29,990. That makes the Mahindra XUV 3XO the more affordable entry point by $8,190.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $23,980 and $32,989 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Mahindra XUV 3XO features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-30 gets a 8.8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mahindra XUV 3XO stands out with wireless charging that you will not find on the Mazda CX-30. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mahindra XUV 3XO uses a Petrol producing 82kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.4 seconds.
The Mazda CX-30 responds with a Petrol making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels.
The Mazda CX-30 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 82kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mahindra XUV 3XO measures 3,990mm long on a 2,600mm wheelbase, 405mm shorter than the Mazda CX-30 at 4,395mm (2,655mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-30 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 364L in the Mahindra XUV 3XO and 317L in the Mazda CX-30, giving the Mahindra XUV 3XO a 47L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 10.6m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,853/year for the Mahindra XUV 3XO and $1,796/year for the Mazda CX-30. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-30.
Estimated annual total: $1,853 (Mahindra XUV 3XO) vs $1,796 (Mazda CX-30). The Mazda CX-30 saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (Mahindra XUV 3XO) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30). The Mahindra XUV 3XO has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mahindra XUV 3XO if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mahindra's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mahindra XUV 3XO takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-30 will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mahindra XUV 3XO has a clear edge. The Mahindra XUV 3XO adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mahindra XUV 3XO and Mazda CX-30?
The Mahindra XUV 3XO is the cheapest at $21,800 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-30 by $8,190.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda CX-30 uses the least fuel at 6.3L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of Mahindra XUV 3XO and Mazda CX-30 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mahindra XUV 3XO has the largest boot at 364L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-30 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mahindra XUV 3XO has the longest warranty at 7 years / 150k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-30 makes the most power at 114kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
