CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMahindra XUV 3XO vs Mazda CX-30
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mahindra XUV 3XO vs Mazda CX-30

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMahindraMazda
Price (RRP)$23,490$29,990
Power82kW114kW
0-100 km/h10.4s10.9s
Fuel Economy6.5 L/100km6 L/100km
Boot Space364L350L
Towing1,000kg
Warranty7yr / 150k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety4 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mahindra XUV 3XO starts from $23,490 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-30 opens at $29,990. That makes the Mahindra XUV 3XO the more affordable entry point by $6,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $25,839 and $32,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

The Mazda CX-30 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Mahindra XUV 3XO.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mahindra XUV 3XO packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-30.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mahindra XUV 3XO stands out with wireless charging that you will not find on the Mazda CX-30. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mahindra XUV 3XO uses a Petrol producing 82kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.4 seconds.

The Mazda CX-30 responds with a Petrol making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-30 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 82kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mahindra XUV 3XO is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mahindra XUV 3XO measures 3,990mm long on a 2,600mm wheelbase, 405mm shorter than the Mazda CX-30 at 4,395mm (2,655mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-30 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 364L in the Mahindra XUV 3XO and 350L in the Mazda CX-30, giving the Mahindra XUV 3XO a 14L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6m
Mazda CX-30
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,853/year for the Mahindra XUV 3XO and $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-30. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-30.

Estimated annual total: $1,853 (Mahindra XUV 3XO) vs $1,710 (Mazda CX-30). The Mazda CX-30 saves you roughly $143 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (Mahindra XUV 3XO) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30). The Mahindra XUV 3XO has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mahindra XUV 3XO if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mahindra's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mahindra XUV 3XO takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-30 will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. The Mahindra XUV 3XO adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mahindra XUV 3XO and Mazda CX-30?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO is the cheapest at $23,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-30 by $6,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-30 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Mazda CX-30 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO has the largest boot at 364L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-30 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO has the longest warranty at 7 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-30 makes the most power at 114kW. The Mahindra XUV 3XO is quickest to 100km/h in 10.4s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs