CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-6e vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-6e vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$53,990$53,990
Range (WLTP)484km84km
Battery78 kWh20 kWh
Power190kW225kW
0-100 km/h7s
Max DC Charge194kW50kW
10-80% Charge Time15 min38 min
Fuel Economy7.3 kWh/100km
Boot Space363L478L
Towing1,500kg1,600kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km10yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars
V2LYesNo

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-6e starts from $53,990 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV opens at $53,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $59,389 and $59,389 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-6e features a 26.5-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-6e stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, ventilated seats and V2L that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-6e uses a Electric producing 190kW and 290Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV responds with a Petrol making 225kW and 450Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the clear power advantage at 225kW vs 190kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 78kWh (Mazda CX-6e) vs 20kWh (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV), giving WLTP ranges of 484km and 84km. DC fast charging peaks at 194kW (Mazda CX-6e) vs 50kW (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV).

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-6e measures 4,850mm long on a 2,902mm wheelbase, 140mm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV at 4,710mm (2,705mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-6e generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 363L in the Mazda CX-6e and 478L in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, giving the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV a 115L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1434L vs 1500L. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV leads with a 1,600kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.0m

Mazda CX-6e GT
11.0mTighter
Best
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV ES
11.0m
Best
Mazda CX-6e
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-6e) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV). The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-6e if: You or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-6e takes 6 of 10 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-6e and Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV?

The Mazda CX-6e is the cheapest at $53,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the largest boot at 478L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,600kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV makes the most power at 225kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs