CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-6e vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-6e vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$53,990$52,990
Range (WLTP)484km
Battery78 kWh
Power190kW133kW
0-100 km/h11.5s
Max DC Charge194kW
10-80% Charge Time15 min
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km
Boot Space363L131L
Towing1,500kg3,100kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km10yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars
V2LYesNo

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-6e starts from $53,990 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport opens at $52,990. That makes the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $59,389 and $58,289 respectively.

The Mazda CX-6e qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-6e features a 26.5-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-6e stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, ventilated seats, power tailgate and V2L that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-6e gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-6e uses a Electric producing 190kW and 290Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout.

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport responds with a Diesel making 133kW and 430Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-6e has the clear power advantage at 190kW vs 133kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-6e measures 4,850mm long on a 2,902mm wheelbase, 65mm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport at 4,785mm (2,800mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-6e generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 363L in the Mazda CX-6e and 131L in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport, giving the Mazda CX-6e a 232L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1434L vs 1500L.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport leads with a 3,100kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.4m

Mazda CX-6e GT
11.0mTighter
Best
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLX
11.4m
Worst
Mazda CX-6e
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-6e) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Pajero Sport). The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-6e if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-6e takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-6e has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-6e and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport is the cheapest at $52,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-6e by $1,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Pajero Sport all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-6e has the largest boot at 363L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,100kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-6e makes the most power at 190kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs