CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi Pajero Sport vs GWM Tank 300
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs GWM Tank 300

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiGWM
Price (RRP)$52,990$49,990
Power133kW167kW
0-100 km/h11.5s9.5s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km9.5 L/100km
Boot Space131L550L
Towing3,100kg2,000kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport starts from $52,990 before on-road costs, while the GWM Tank 300 opens at $49,990. That makes the GWM Tank 300 the more affordable entry point by $3,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $58,289 and $54,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport and GWM Tank 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Tank 300 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport and 6 in the GWM Tank 300.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the GWM Tank 300 gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the GWM Tank 300. The GWM Tank 300 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, panoramic roof and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport uses a Diesel producing 133kW and 430Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.

The GWM Tank 300 responds with a Petrol making 167kW and 387Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The GWM Tank 300 has the clear power advantage at 167kW vs 133kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Tank 300 is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport measures 4,785mm long on a 2,800mm wheelbase, 70mm longer than the GWM Tank 300 at 4,715mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 131L in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport and 550L in the GWM Tank 300, giving the GWM Tank 300 a 419L advantage.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport leads with a 3,100kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 12.0m

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLX
11.4mTighter
Best
GWM Tank 300 Lux
12.0m
Worst
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Tank 300
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport and $2,708/year for the GWM Tank 300. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Mitsubishi Pajero Sport) vs $2,708 (GWM Tank 300). The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Pajero Sport) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 300). The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Tank 300 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Tank 300 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Tank 300 has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs