CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-8 vs Ford Everest
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-8 vs Ford Everest

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaFord
Price (RRP)TBC$68,990
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power140kW184kW
Fuel Economy6 L/100km8.5 L/100km
Boot Space209L259L
Towing2,000kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Mazda CX-8 & Ford Everest

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-8 and Ford Everest hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 96% for the Mazda CX-8 and 86% for the Ford Everest.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on both.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-8 and 9 in the Ford Everest.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-8 stands out with head-up display and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Ford Everest. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-8 lines up producing 140kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a AWD layout.

The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel V6 Turbo making 184kW and 600Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 140kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-8 measures 4,925mm long on a 2,930mm wheelbase, 53mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-8 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 209L in the Mazda CX-8 and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Ford Everest a 50L advantage. The Ford Everest seats 7 vs 6.

For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 11.8m

TightestMazda CX-8 Asaki LE AWD (6-seat, MY23)Tightest turn at 11.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda CX-8 Asaki LE AWD (6-seat, MY23)
11.6mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m
Worst
Mazda CX-8 Asaki LE AWD (6-seat, MY23)
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda CX-8Tightest turn at 11.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda CX-8Tightest11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Ford Everest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-8 and $2,423/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $713 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-8.

Warranty: 5 years (Mazda CX-8) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-8 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Everest takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Mazda CX-8 will save you roughly $713 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Ford Everest has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-8 and Ford Everest?

The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $68,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-8 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Mazda CX-8 and Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Ford Everest has the largest boot at 259L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Everest makes the most power at 184kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs