CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-80 vs Kia Sorento
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-80 vs Kia Sorento

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaKia
Price (RRP)$64,490$36,490
Power209kW200kW
0-100 km/h9s8s
Fuel Economy7.1 L/100km6.8 L/100km
Boot Space550L179L
Towing2,000kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-80 starts from $64,490 before on-road costs, while the Kia Sorento opens at $36,490. That makes the Kia Sorento the more affordable entry point by $28,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $70,939 and $40,139 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-80 and Kia Sorento hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Mazda CX-80 and 82% for the Kia Sorento.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-80 and 7 in the Kia Sorento.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-80 stands out with power tailgate that you will not find on the Kia Sorento. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-80 uses a Petrol producing 209kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.

The Kia Sorento responds with a Petrol making 200kW and 332Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8 seconds.

The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 200kW. In the real-world sprint, the Kia Sorento is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-80 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 175mm longer than the Kia Sorento at 4,815mm (2,815mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 550L in the Mazda CX-80 and 179L in the Kia Sorento, giving the Mazda CX-80 a 371L advantage.

For towing, the Kia Sorento leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.8m

Kia Sorento S Petrol
11.2mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
11.8m
Worst
Mazda CX-80
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Kia Sorento
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,024/year for the Mazda CX-80 and $1,938/year for the Kia Sorento. That is a $86 annual difference in favour of the Kia Sorento.

Estimated annual total: $2,024 (Mazda CX-80) vs $1,938 (Kia Sorento). The Kia Sorento saves you roughly $86 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Sorento). The Kia Sorento has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Kia Sorento if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Kia Sorento takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Kia Sorento will save you roughly $86 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-80 has a clear edge. The Kia Sorento adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-80 and Kia Sorento?

The Kia Sorento is the cheapest at $36,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-80 by $28,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Kia Sorento uses the least fuel at 6.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-80 and Kia Sorento all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-80 has the largest boot at 550L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia Sorento has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW. The Kia Sorento is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs