CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-80 vs Zeekr 7X
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-80 vs Zeekr 7X

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaZeekr
Price (RRP)$56,100$57,900
Fuel typeDieselElectric
Range (WLTP)480km
Battery75 kWh
Power187kW310kW
0-100 km/h9s6s
Max DC Charge450kW
10-80% Charge Time11 min
Fuel Economy5.2 L/100km
Boot Space258L539L
Towing2,000kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Mazda CX-80 & Zeekr 7X

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-80 starts from $56,100 before on-road costs, while the Zeekr 7X opens at $57,900. That makes the Mazda CX-80 the more affordable entry point by $1,800.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $61,710 and $63,690 respectively.

The Zeekr 7X qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda CX-80, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-80 and Zeekr 7X hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Mazda CX-80 and 91% for the Zeekr 7X.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 9 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Zeekr 7X, against 6 on the Mazda CX-80.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-80 and 7 in the Zeekr 7X.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

100kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 36m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 450kW · 0–80%

13 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (22kW AC, 450kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-80 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Zeekr 7X gets a 16-inch display and 13-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Zeekr 7X counters with wireless charging, panoramic roof and ambient lighting that the Mazda CX-80 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-80 gets cloth upholstery while the Zeekr 7X offers synthetic pu leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Mazda CX-80 and 2-zone in the Zeekr 7X.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-80 uses a Diesel producing 187kW and 550Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.

The Zeekr 7X responds with a Electric making 310kW and 440Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6 seconds.

The Zeekr 7X has the clear power advantage at 310kW vs 187kW. In the real-world sprint, the Zeekr 7X is 3.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-80 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 203mm longer than the Zeekr 7X at 4,787mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 258L in the Mazda CX-80 and 539L in the Zeekr 7X, giving the Zeekr 7X a 281L advantage. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Zeekr 7X leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 11.8m

TightestMazda CX-80 D50e PureTightest turn at 11.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda CX-80 D50e Pure
11.8mTighter
Best
Zeekr 7X RWD
11.8m
Best
Mazda CX-80 D50e Pure
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Zeekr 7X RWD
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda CX-80Tightest turn at 11.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda CX-80Tightest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Zeekr 7X11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80) vs 5 years / 200,000km (Zeekr 7X). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Zeekr 7X if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Zeekr's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Zeekr 7X takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Zeekr 7X has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-80 and Zeekr 7X?

The Mazda CX-80 is the cheapest at $56,100 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Zeekr 7X by $1,800.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-80 uses the least fuel at 5.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-80 and Zeekr 7X all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Zeekr 7X has the largest boot at 539L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Zeekr 7X makes the most power at 310kW. The Zeekr 7X is quickest to 100km/h in 6s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best electric SUVs