Mazda CX-9 vs Ford Everest
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Mazda CX-9
Price TBC
SUV
Petrol
—
204kW
11.2 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
267L
Ford Everest
From $68,990
SUV
Diesel
Diesel V6 Turbo
184kW
8.5 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
259L
Track the Mazda CX-9 & Ford Everest
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-9 features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Ford Everest gets a 12-inch display and 8-inch instruments.
The Ford Everest counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and ventilated seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-9 lines up producing 204kW and 367Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic (activematic) to a AWD layout.
The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel V6 Turbo making 184kW and 600Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.
The Mazda CX-9 has the clear power advantage at 204kW vs 184kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-9 measures 5,099mm long on a 2,875mm wheelbase, 121mm longer than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 267L in the Mazda CX-9 and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Mazda CX-9 a 8L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 928L vs 1818L.
For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.4m to 11.8m
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,192/year for the Mazda CX-9 and $2,423/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $769 annual difference in favour of the Ford Everest.
Warranty: 3 years (Mazda CX-9) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). The Ford Everest has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-9 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Ford Everest if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Ford Everest takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Ford Everest will save you roughly $769 a year in fuel. The Ford Everest adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-9 and Ford Everest?
The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $68,990 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Ford Everest uses the least fuel at 8.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Ford Everest holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mazda CX-9, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-9 has the largest boot at 267L.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Ford Everest has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-9 makes the most power at 204kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
