CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda Mazda3 vs Proton Satria Neo
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda Mazda3 vs Proton Satria Neo

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Proton Satria Neo: we're still completing price, seat count, turning circle and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMazdaProton
Price (RRP)$26,490TBC
Fuel typePetrol
Power114kW82kW
0-100 km/h9.7s13.7s
Fuel Economy5.9 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space295L
Towing1,200kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Mazda Mazda3 & Proton Satria Neo

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mazda Mazda3 stands out with Apple CarPlay and head-up display that you will not find on the Proton Satria Neo. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda Mazda3 uses a 2.0 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT petrol with i-stop and cylinder deactivation producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic (skyactiv-drive) to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.7 seconds.

The Proton Satria Neo lines up making 82kW and 148Nm, paired to a 4-speed automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 13.7 seconds.

The Mazda Mazda3 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 82kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda Mazda3 is 4.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda Mazda3 measures 4,460mm long on a 2,725mm wheelbase, 555mm longer than the Proton Satria Neo at 3,905mm (2,440mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda3 generally means more rear legroom.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Mazda Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m
Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
Mazda Mazda3 Turning circle · Ø 10.6 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.2 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the Mazda Mazda3 and $2,109/year for the Proton Satria Neo. That is a $427 annual difference in favour of the Mazda Mazda3.

Estimated annual total: $1,682 (Mazda Mazda3) vs $2,109 (Proton Satria Neo). The Mazda Mazda3 saves you roughly $427 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda3) vs 3 years (Proton Satria Neo). The Mazda Mazda3 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda Mazda3 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Proton Satria Neo if: You or prefer Proton's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda Mazda3 takes 4 of 4 key spec categories. The Mazda Mazda3 will save you roughly $427 a year in fuel. The Mazda Mazda3 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda Mazda3 and Proton Satria Neo?

The Mazda Mazda3 is the cheapest at $26,490 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda Mazda3 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Mazda Mazda3 and Proton Satria Neo carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda Mazda3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mazda Mazda3 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda Mazda3 makes the most power at 114kW. The Mazda Mazda3 is quickest to 100km/h in 9.7s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars