CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda MX-5 vs Isuzu D-Max
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda MX-5 vs Isuzu D-Max

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaIsuzu
Price (RRP)$41,520$41,243
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power135kW120kW
0-100 km/h6.5s
Fuel Economy6.8 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Boot Space130L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited6yr / 150k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Mazda MX-5 & Isuzu D-Max

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda MX-5 starts from $41,520 before on-road costs, while the Isuzu D-Max opens at $41,243. That makes the Isuzu D-Max the more affordable entry point by $277.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $45,672 and $45,367 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda MX-5 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen, while the Isuzu D-Max gets a 8-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda MX-5 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Isuzu D-Max. The Isuzu D-Max counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda MX-5 gets black cloth with synthetic suede upholstery while the Isuzu D-Max offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Mazda MX-5 uses a 2.0 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT petrol (Skyactiv-G) producing 135kW and 205Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual (skyactiv-mt) to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.5 seconds.

The Isuzu D-Max responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels.

The Mazda MX-5 has the clear power advantage at 135kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda MX-5 measures 3,915mm long on a 2,310mm wheelbase, 1425mm shorter than the Isuzu D-Max at 5,340mm (3,125mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Isuzu D-Max generally means more rear legroom.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m to 12.5m

TightestMazda MX-5 RoadsterTightest turn at 9.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda MX-5 Roadster
9.4mTighter
Best
Isuzu D-Max SX Single Cab Chassis 4x2
12.5m
Worst
Mazda MX-5 Roadster
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Isuzu D-Max SX Single Cab Chassis 4x2
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda MX-5Tightest turn at 9.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda MX-5Tightest9.4 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Isuzu D-Max12.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,938/year for the Mazda MX-5 and $1,967/year for the Isuzu D-Max. That is a $29 annual difference in favour of the Mazda MX-5.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda MX-5) vs 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu D-Max). The Isuzu D-Max has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda MX-5 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Isuzu D-Max if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mazda MX-5 and Isuzu D-Max trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mazda MX-5 will save you roughly $29 a year in fuel. The Isuzu D-Max adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda MX-5 and Isuzu D-Max?

The Isuzu D-Max is the cheapest at $41,243 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda MX-5 by $277.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda MX-5 uses the least fuel at 6.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Isuzu D-Max holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mazda MX-5, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu D-Max has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Isuzu D-Max has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda MX-5 makes the most power at 135kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Convertibles · All Utes · Best family cars · Best utes in Australia