CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door vs Lexus ES
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door vs Lexus ES

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door: we're still completing price, length, width, height and wheelbase, plus 2 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMercedes-BenzLexus
Price (RRP)TBC$65,540
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power320kW160kW
0-100 km/h4.5s8.9s
Fuel Economy10.4 L/100km4.8 L/100km
Boot Space456L454L
Warranty5yr / Unlimited4yr / 100k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door & Lexus ES

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door stands out with ventilated seats and Burmester audio that you will not find on the Lexus ES. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door gets exclusive nappa leather upholstery while the Lexus ES offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door uses a Petrol producing 320kW and 520Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.5 seconds.

The Lexus ES responds with a Hybrid making 160kW and 221Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.9 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door has the clear power advantage at 320kW vs 160kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door is 4.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

Boot space is 456L in the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door and 454L in the Lexus ES, giving the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door a 2L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 12.6m

TightestLexus ES ES300h LuxuryTightest turn at 11.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Lexus ES ES300h Luxury
11.6mTighter
Best
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door GT 53 4MATIC+
12.6m
Worst
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door GT 53 4MATIC+
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Lexus ES ES300h Luxury
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestLexus ESTightest turn at 11.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door12.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Lexus ESTightest11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,964/year for the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door and $1,368/year for the Lexus ES. That is a $1,596 annual difference in favour of the Lexus ES.

Estimated annual total: $2,964 (Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door) vs $1,368 (Lexus ES). The Lexus ES saves you roughly $1,596 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years (Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door) vs 4 years / 100,000km (Lexus ES). The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —4yr (Lexus ES).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Lexus ES if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Lexus's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The Lexus ES will save you roughly $1,596 a year in fuel. The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door and Lexus ES?

The Lexus ES is the cheapest at $65,540 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Lexus ES uses the least fuel at 4.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door and Lexus ES carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door has the largest boot at 456L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door makes the most power at 320kW. The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 4-Door is quickest to 100km/h in 4.5s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best hybrid cars