CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMercedes-Benz AMG GT vs Mercedes-Benz EQS
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT vs Mercedes-Benz EQS

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$373,000$209,900
Fuel typePetrolElectric
Range (WLTP)708km
Battery107.8 kWh
Power430kW245kW
0-100 km/h3.2s6.2s
Max DC Charge200kW
10-80% Charge Time31 min
Fuel Economy14.1 L/100km
Boot Space321L610L
Towing2,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT & Mercedes-Benz EQS

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT starts from $373,000 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz EQS opens at $209,900. That makes the Mercedes-Benz EQS the more affordable entry point by $163,100.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $410,300 and $230,890 respectively.

The Mercedes-Benz EQS qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

108.4kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 44m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 200kW · 0–80%

33 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 200kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz EQS. The Mercedes-Benz EQS counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT uses a Petrol producing 430kW and 800Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.2 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz EQS responds with a Electric making 245kW and 568Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.2 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT has the clear power advantage at 430kW vs 245kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT is 3.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT measures 4,728mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 488mm shorter than the Mercedes-Benz EQS at 5,216mm (3,210mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mercedes-Benz EQS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 321L in the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT and 610L in the Mercedes-Benz EQS, giving the Mercedes-Benz EQS a 289L advantage. The Mercedes-Benz EQS seats 5 vs 4.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.4m to 12.5m

TightestMercedes-Benz EQS EQS450+Tightest turn at 12.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mercedes-Benz EQS EQS450+
12.4mTighter
Best
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 4MATIC+
12.5m
Worst
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 4MATIC+
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mercedes-Benz EQS EQS450+
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMercedes-Benz EQSTightest turn at 12.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT12.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Mercedes-Benz EQSTightest12.4 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz AMG GT) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz EQS). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz EQS if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT and Mercedes-Benz EQS trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Mercedes-Benz EQS has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT and Mercedes-Benz EQS?

The Mercedes-Benz EQS is the cheapest at $209,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT by $163,100.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT uses the least fuel at 14.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mercedes-Benz EQS all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz EQS has the largest boot at 610L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mercedes-Benz EQS has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT makes the most power at 430kW. The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT is quickest to 100km/h in 3.2s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars · Best electric cars