CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMercedes-Benz GLA vs MINI Aceman
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mercedes-Benz GLA vs MINI Aceman

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMercedes-BenzMINI
Price (RRP)$58,900$60,990
Range (WLTP)352km
Battery54.2 kWh
Power120kW160kW
0-100 km/h9.1s7.1s
Max DC Charge95kW
10-80% Charge Time31 min
Fuel Economy6.2 L/100km
Boot Space435L300L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mercedes-Benz GLA starts from $58,900 before on-road costs, while the MINI Aceman opens at $60,990. That makes the Mercedes-Benz GLA the more affordable entry point by $2,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $64,790 and $67,089 respectively.

The MINI Aceman qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mercedes-Benz GLA, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mercedes-Benz GLA and MINI Aceman hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 96% for the Mercedes-Benz GLA and 83% for the MINI Aceman.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MINI Aceman packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Mercedes-Benz GLA.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mercedes-Benz GLA and 9 in the MINI Aceman.

Feature Showdown

The Mercedes-Benz GLA features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the MINI Aceman gets a 9.4-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MINI Aceman counters with wireless charging, panoramic roof and Harman Kardon audio that the Mercedes-Benz GLA does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mercedes-Benz GLA gets synthetic leather upholstery while the MINI Aceman offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Mercedes-Benz GLA uses a Petrol producing 120kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The MINI Aceman responds with a Electric making 160kW and 330Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.1 seconds.

The MINI Aceman has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the MINI Aceman is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mercedes-Benz GLA measures 4,411mm long on a 2,729mm wheelbase, 338mm longer than the MINI Aceman at 4,073mm (2,606mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mercedes-Benz GLA generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 435L in the Mercedes-Benz GLA and 300L in the MINI Aceman, giving the Mercedes-Benz GLA a 135L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.0m

MINI Aceman SE Favoured
10.6mTighter
Best
Mercedes-Benz GLA GLA200
11.0m
Worst
Mercedes-Benz GLA
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
MINI Aceman
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz GLA) vs 5 years / 999,999km (MINI Aceman). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mercedes-Benz GLA if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MINI Aceman if: You prioritise performance, or prefer MINI's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mercedes-Benz GLA takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Mercedes-Benz GLA has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mercedes-Benz GLA and MINI Aceman?

The Mercedes-Benz GLA is the cheapest at $58,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MINI Aceman by $2,090.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz GLA uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mercedes-Benz GLA and MINI Aceman all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz GLA has the largest boot at 435L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mercedes-Benz GLA has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The MINI Aceman makes the most power at 160kW. The MINI Aceman is quickest to 100km/h in 7.1s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs