CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMercedes-Benz GLA vs MINI Aceman
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mercedes-Benz GLA vs MINI Aceman

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Mercedes-Benz GLA
Winner
Mercedes-Benz

Mercedes-Benz GLA

From $58,900

Body

SUV

Fuel type

Petrol

Engine

Petrol

Power

120kW

Economy

6.2 L/100km

Safety

ANCAP: no data

Boot

435L

View full details
MINI Aceman
MINI

MINI Aceman

From $60,990

Body

SUV

Fuel type

Electric

Engine

Electric

Power

160kW

Economy

Safety

5★ ANCAP

Boot

300L

View full details
SpecMercedes-BenzMINI
Price (RRP)$58,900$60,990
Fuel typePetrolElectric
Range (WLTP)352km
Battery54.2 kWh
Power120kW160kW
0-100 km/h9.1s7.1s
Max DC Charge95kW
10-80% Charge Time31 min
Fuel Economy6.2 L/100km
Boot Space435L300L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Mercedes-Benz GLA & MINI Aceman

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mercedes-Benz GLA starts from $58,900 before on-road costs, while the MINI Aceman opens at $60,990. That makes the Mercedes-Benz GLA the more affordable entry point by $2,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $64,790 and $67,089 respectively.

The MINI Aceman qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mercedes-Benz GLA, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

49.2kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

47 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 95kW · 0–80%

31 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 95kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Mercedes-Benz GLA features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the MINI Aceman gets a 9.4-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MINI Aceman counters with wireless charging, panoramic roof and Harman Kardon audio that the Mercedes-Benz GLA does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mercedes-Benz GLA gets synthetic leather upholstery while the MINI Aceman offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Mercedes-Benz GLA uses a Petrol producing 120kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The MINI Aceman responds with a Electric making 160kW and 330Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.1 seconds.

The MINI Aceman has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the MINI Aceman is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mercedes-Benz GLA measures 4,411mm long on a 2,729mm wheelbase, 338mm longer than the MINI Aceman at 4,073mm (2,606mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mercedes-Benz GLA generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 435L in the Mercedes-Benz GLA and 300L in the MINI Aceman, giving the Mercedes-Benz GLA a 135L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.1m

TightestMercedes-Benz GLA GLA200Tightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mercedes-Benz GLA GLA200
11.0mTighter
Best
MINI Aceman SE Favoured
11.1m
Worst
Mercedes-Benz GLA GLA200
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
MINI Aceman SE Favoured
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMercedes-Benz GLATightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Mercedes-Benz GLATightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
MINI Aceman11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz GLA) vs 5 years / 999,999km (MINI Aceman). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mercedes-Benz GLA if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MINI Aceman if: You prioritise performance, or prefer MINI's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mercedes-Benz GLA takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Mercedes-Benz GLA has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mercedes-Benz GLA and MINI Aceman?

The Mercedes-Benz GLA is the cheapest at $58,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MINI Aceman by $2,090.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz GLA uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MINI Aceman all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz GLA has the largest boot at 435L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mercedes-Benz GLA has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The MINI Aceman makes the most power at 160kW. The MINI Aceman is quickest to 100km/h in 7.1s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best electric SUVs